Teams

FK - Matlock

2023 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Adult Women 55 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-19vs FK - Kicking AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesRhonda Sangster / Betsy Calder vs Christine Devito / Maggie Berardi2-6, 5-7
2023-03-12vs MARION/Ennett/Women/6.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesRhonda Sangster / Betsy Calder vs Toni Maiques / Ketty Smith6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesMary Stevens / Patricia James vs Linda Curtis / Ann Marie Simonelli6-7, 6-7
2023-03-05vs FK - LongWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatricia James / Joan Matlock vs Carina Gandiongco / Maryse Whitsett6-1, 6-1
2023-02-12vs FK - Kicking AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesBetsy Calder / Rhonda Sangster vs Margie McLellan / Cindy Hinton6-1, 6-4
2023-02-05vs MARION/Ennett/Women/6.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoan Matlock / Rhonda Sangster vs Joan Kelsey / Tracy Shisler2-6, 6-7
2023-01-31vs FK - LongWon 10
W#1 DoublesBetsy Calder / Rhonda Sangster vs Renuka Swaminathan / Jane Ryals6-0, 6-3
2023-01-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCARMEL CONNOR / Patricia James vs Jill Santoriello / Karen Russell4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Patricia James
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.74
NANCY TUTEN
published
2.64
Donna Davis
published
2.63
Betsy Calder
published 3
2.59
Joan Matlock
published
2.58
CARMEL CONNOR
published 3
Mary Stevens
published
Monique Foster
published
Rhonda Sangster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Trish Mosby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Stevens + CARMEL CONNOR123 matchesnot enough data
Joan Matlock + CARMEL CONNOR213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia James
98W–75L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
NANCY TUTEN
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.74
Donna Davis
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Betsy Calder
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
2.63
Joan Matlock
25W–37L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
2.59
3
CARMEL CONNOR
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
2.58
Mary Stevens
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Monique Foster
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rhonda Sangster
125W–102L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Trish Mosby
2W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.