Teams

Jensen

2025 USTA League Adult 40 & Over - Fall 2024- HSV · 3.5 WOMEN 40N1S3D

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-29vs Jackson/Wiles 40nightLost 04
L#1 DoublesSusan Jensen / Francesca Lee vs Chris Jackson / Kathleen Waite3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVanessa Moorman vs Pam Deerman3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Haynes / Pamela Crook vs Janet Mmbaha / Elizabeth Weiland5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLea Anne Schultz / Beth Bryant vs Judy Wiles / Irene Wisner0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 WOMEN 40N1S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Bonnie Powers
published 3.5
3.27
Susan Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.23
Francesca Lee
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.18
Nally Bukenya
published
3.02
Pamela Crook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Nora Vanderploeg
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Melissa Haynes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Laura Collins
published
2.85
Monique Haselden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Vanessa Moorman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.81
Lea Anne Schultz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Aria Campbell
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanessa Moorman + Monique Haselden91052% games+2.4% vs expected
Melissa Haynes + Pamela Crook31336% games−3.8% vs expected
Francesca Lee + Susan Jensen3248% gamesnot enough data
Vanessa Moorman + Lea Anne Schultz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bonnie Powers
14W–18L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Susan Jensen
29W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
Francesca Lee
17W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Nally Bukenya
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Pamela Crook
11W–55L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.02
Nora Vanderploeg
58W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
2.96
Melissa Haynes
48W–54L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Laura Collins
12W–34L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.88
Monique Haselden
42W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Vanessa Moorman
35W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
Lea Anne Schultz
24W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Aria Campbell
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.