Teams

Kostal TOCC

2025 Combo Doubles 55 & Over-GC · Women 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-09vs Biloxi-Lyons 55Lost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Allison / Mary Brumfield vs Holly Bourgeois / Melissa Steenkamp4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLane Hoggard / Penny Westfaul vs Gerry MacKay / Torie Hardee6-7, 5-7
2025-10-01vs TOCC MaxeyLost 03
L#1 DoublesGina Kostal / Ann Guice vs Sue Battaile / Toni Fillmore5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCharlene Langlinais / Lisa Chapman vs Beth Gordin / Connie Johnston4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDarlene Nichols / Lane Hoggard vs Yvette Weeks / Mildred Dickson0-6, 3-6
2025-09-30vs Pass Christian - GargiuloLost 03
L#1 DoublesCharlene Langlinais / Shari Newman vs Vicki Rogers / Petie Bryant1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAnn Guice / Mary Brumfield vs Dana Delvescovo / Courtney Schiro1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Hoskins / Mary Ashbaker vs Kimberly Keel / Jo Ann Lozes4-6, 2-6
2025-09-22vs Knight/BBTC 55+6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesShari Pol / Pamela Hoskins vs Sam Allen / Kathleen Mayer3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDarlene Nichols / Lane Hoggard vs Cathy Saunier / Bridget Weatherly3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Guice / Elise Bourgeois vs Linda Benigno / Carrie Rester0-6, 2-6
2025-09-18vs Diamondhead-BeddoeLost 02
L#1 DoublesDarlene Nichols / Lisa Chapman vs Kristin Beddoe / Shirley Brehm3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCharlene Langlinais / Mary Ashbaker vs Rhonda Lohmeyer / Stephanie Hardie0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-08-20vs Wixon SRYCWon 21
W#1 DoublesShari Pol / Lisa Chapman vs Angela Nix / Tracy Porter6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCharlene Langlinais / Mary Ashbaker vs Teresa Acosta / Mary Lang6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnn Guice / Shari Newman vs Lauri-Ellen Smith / Nita Shepherd4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Knight/BBTC 55+6.55113512118
2TOCC Maxey5113513133
3Diamondhead-Beddoe3311717124
4Biloxi-Lyons 553371123175
5Kostal TOCC1531530195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Stephanie Allison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Penny Westfaul
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Shari Pol
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.92
Darlene Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.87
Ann Guice
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.87
Charlene Langlinais
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.81
Elise Bourgeois
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Gina Kostal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Lane Hoggard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Mary Ashbaker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Pamela Hoskins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.22
Shari Newman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Brumfield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlene Langlinais + Darlene Nichols3744% games−4.0% vs expected
Elise Bourgeois + Pamela Hoskins134 matchesnot enough data
Lane Hoggard + Pamela Hoskins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Allison
27W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Penny Westfaul
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Shari Pol
27W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Darlene Nichols
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.92
3.5
Ann Guice
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
3.5
Charlene Langlinais
6W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
Elise Bourgeois
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Gina Kostal
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Lane Hoggard
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Mary Ashbaker
14W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
2.60
Pamela Hoskins
6W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Shari Newman
5W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.22
Mary Brumfield
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.