Teams

Smith - NYCC

2025 Hampton Roads Adult 40 & Over · Hampton Roads Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-25vs Munden - Tennis School DropoutsWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarol Branch / Susan Brown vs Ashley Holmes / Candace Munden6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKarla Smith / Paula Fridley vs Shannon Dupre / Mariel McClung6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarrie Coleman / Kathryn Kramer vs Cori Damuth / Susan Genzler7-6, 7-6
2025-07-22vs CamdenWon 10
W#1 SinglesKathryn Fraim vs Andrea Keller2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-07-08vs HALTERWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathryn Kramer / Kathryn Fraim vs Beth Anderson / Traci Corcoran6-1, 6-2
2025-07-01vs CamdenLost 01
L#3 DoublesKathryn Fraim / Sarah Weinberg vs Andrea Keller / Erin Camden3-6, 4-6
2025-06-24Won 10
W#1 SinglesKathryn Fraim vs Avery Solomon7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-10vs CamdenLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Coleman / Kathryn Fraim vs Erin Camden / Tammy Willett3-6, 6-7
2025-06-03vs Munden - Tennis School DropoutsWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarrie Coleman / Kathryn Fraim vs Sara Froehler / Tiffani Sherlock6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Kathryn Fraim
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Rebecca Hoover
published
3.29
Carrie Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Carol Branch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Merritt Keffer
published
3.09
Karla Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Rachel Mullet-Cline
published
2.93
Kathryn Kramer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.70
Sarah Weinberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Paula Fridley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Coleman + Kathryn Fraim11655% games+3.0% vs expected
Karla Smith + Rachel Mullet-Cline134 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Mullet-Cline + Kathryn Kramer224 matchesnot enough data
Karla Smith + Paula Fridley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kathryn Fraim
72W–55L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Rebecca Hoover
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Carrie Coleman
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Carol Branch
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Merritt Keffer
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Karla Smith
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
25%74%<1%
3.09
Rachel Mullet-Cline
20W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Kathryn Kramer
23W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Sarah Weinberg
5W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Paula Fridley
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.