Teams

Quail West - Seese

2023 Collier Adult 55 & Over Fall · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.43 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-08vs Pelican Bay Park - HaasLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatrina Tiedge / Pam Davis vs Cheryl Copps / Beth Rainey3-6, 2-6
2022-12-01vs Marco YMCA - AmatoLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Seese / Katrina Tiedge vs Luanne Kerins / Ana Cecilia Isaza3-6, 3-6
2022-11-29vs Vineyards - KronenLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatrina Tiedge / Jeannette Licht vs Gay Kronen / Christine Kriss3-6, 2-6
2022-11-17vs Valencia Bonita - DoranWon 10
W#3 DoublesDoreen Clappin / Christine Seese vs JoAnn Susko / Maria Prochilo6-3, 6-2
2022-11-14vs Sterling Oaks - C. GouldWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatrina Tiedge / Doreen Clappin vs Barbara Beard / Amy McHale7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Coquette Fluharty vs Deborah Norton / Elisabeth Beck6-1, 6-2
2022-10-27vs Grey Oaks - ArchieWon 20
W#1 DoublesDoreen Clappin / Katrina Tiedge vs Susan Aldrich / Lindsey Burke6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMary Huber-Olk / Susan Tiano vs Jennifer Archie / Rosemary Cronin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-10-20vs Pelican Marsh - GurbaWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatrina Tiedge / Jeannette Licht vs Judy Kobel / Nancy Spiwak6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Mary Huber-Olk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Doreen Clappin
published 3.5
3.27
Carla Sancin
published 3.5
3.15
Aster Leitner
published 3.5
3.14
Coquette Fluharty
published 3.5
3.10
Pam Davis
published
3.08
Dawn Strang
published 3.5
Christine Seese
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jeannette Licht
published
Katrina Tiedge
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Susan Tiano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katrina Tiedge + Mary Huber-Olk4261% gamesnot enough data
Christine Seese + Mary Huber-Olk4161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mary Huber-Olk
127W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Doreen Clappin
59W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Carla Sancin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Aster Leitner
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Coquette Fluharty
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
Pam Davis
2W–20L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Dawn Strang
29W–22L career · type A · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Christine Seese
14W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeannette Licht
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katrina Tiedge
45W–29L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Tiano
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.