Teams

LBK Public Smith

2025 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekday · 6.0 W Monday

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-17vs Sarasota/Faulkner/55&Over6.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnnmarie Iwanicki / Valri Poley vs Denise McKenna / Rebecca Schultz3-6, 3-6
2025-03-10vs Sarasota/Pluss/55&Over6.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnnmarie Iwanicki / Valri Poley vs Jennifer Esposito / Susan Pluss6-3, 6-1
2025-03-07vs Payne Park HuelsterWon 10
W#2 DoublesValri Poley / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Sheryl King / Ann Hollins6-3, 7-5
2025-03-03vs SSC TruexWon 10
W#3 DoublesValri Poley / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Margaret Capodice / Laura Neutzling3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-02-17vs LBK Club SerlingLost 01
L#1 DoublesValri Poley / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Laura Muth / Jill Serling2-6, 5-7
2025-02-10vs Sarasota/Voltz/55&Over6.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnnmarie Iwanicki / Valri Poley vs Nancy Voltz / Allyson Miller6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-02-03vs Heritage Oaks HottiesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Lackland / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Beth Gemmill / Janie Constantine2-6, 3-6
2025-01-20vs Courtside 50 LoveWon 10
W#2 DoublesValri Poley / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Christine Cully / Renee Walter6-2, 6-2
2024-01-29vs SSC Grossman 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesValri Poley / Dana Marpoe vs Lori Ann Seguin / Kristine Tabone6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJennifer Lackland / Elizabeth Reinhardt vs Patricia Carothers / Laurie Ramocki6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDebbie White / Rebecca Schlecht vs Eileen Grossman / Allison Menezes6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Dana Marpoe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.08
Catherine Diao
published 3
3.01
Debbie White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Annmarie Iwanicki
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.64
1.89
Wendy Stricker
published
Jennifer Lackland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Schlecht
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Valri Poley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dana Marpoe
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.23
3
Catherine Diao
18W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Debbie White
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Annmarie Iwanicki
85W–59L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Anne Marie Jannuzzo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
2.64
Wendy Stricker
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Jennifer Lackland
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Schlecht
2W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Valri Poley
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.