Teams

V - LL2-SpanishHillsSweetShots-Pozzi

2021 USTA Adult 40 &Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN · Ventura - Women 3.0 WD

11 players · average NTRP 3.07 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-07-14Won 10
W#1 SinglesMary Ann Fermin vs Dena Feingold6-1, 6-1
2021-06-23vs V - Sunset Steady BettysSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMary Ann Fermin vs Inna Skripnikova3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEllen Swagerty / Elizabeth Pozzi vs Beatriz Rivera / Raymi Schwartz6-3, 6-1
2021-06-16vs V - North Ranch Double DaresWon 10
W#2 DoublesEllen Swagerty / Mary Ann Fermin vs Susan Bender / Natascha Crecion4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-06-08vs V - Las Posas Country Club DevilsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Pozzi / Rachel Ramirez vs Jean Salcido / Jill Spasiano5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJustine Abbitt vs Wendy Spasiano6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-02vs V - Valle Lindo Double TroubleWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Ann Fermin / Debbie Maulhardt vs Debra Myrent / Michelle Vincent7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Jill Heybl
published 3.5
3.11
Pam Nesseth
published
3.02
Melissa Wallace
published
2.99
Wissal Buscemi
published
2.97
Elizabeth Pozzi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Mary Ann Fermin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.80
Ellen Swagerty
published 3
2.72
Aimee Stotser
published 3
2.69
Justine Abbitt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.55
Debbie Maulhardt
published 3
Rachel Ramirez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wissal Buscemi + Elizabeth Pozzi4262% games+5.1% vs expected
Mary Ann Fermin + Elizabeth Pozzi8654% games−2.8% vs expected
Jill Heybl + Elizabeth Pozzi6357% gamesnot enough data
Mary Ann Fermin + Justine Abbitt2541% gamesnot enough data
Justine Abbitt + Melissa Wallace224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Ann Fermin + Melissa Wallace303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jill Heybl
107W–87L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Pam Nesseth
4W–12L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
Melissa Wallace
22W–15L career · no lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
3.02
Wissal Buscemi
6W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Elizabeth Pozzi
79W–60L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Mary Ann Fermin
105W–78L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Ellen Swagerty
14W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Aimee Stotser
2W–14L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Justine Abbitt
60W–83L career · 1 line in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Debbie Maulhardt
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
35%65%<1%
2.55
Rachel Ramirez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.