Teams

McClung - Sets in the City

2025 Hampton Roads Singles Weeknight · Hampton Roads Singles Weeknight 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-18vs Currie-McGhee - Smash SistersLost 12
L#1 SinglesGrace Doss vs Barbara Durso0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesPatricia Gomez vs Leanne Currie-McGhee1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesMary Grace Seneris vs Jill Clifton6-1, 6-3
2025-11-11vs Currie-McGhee - Smash SistersLost 12
L#1 SinglesMary Grace Seneris vs Barbara Durso0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLiberty Gerescher vs Jamie Friedman1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesMariel McClung vs Megan McClellan7-6, 6-2
2025-11-08vs Currie-McGhee - Smash SistersWon 21
L#1 SinglesNeha Jain vs Jamie Friedman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesGrace Doss vs Leanne Currie-McGhee6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLiberty Gerescher vs Megan McClellan7-6, 6-3
2025-11-04vs Currie-McGhee - Smash SistersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJennifer Rawlings vs Jamie Friedman1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesMariel McClung vs Jill Clifton6-1, 6-4
2025-10-21vs Currie-McGhee - Smash SistersSplit 11
L#2 SinglesMariel McClung vs Jamie Friedman2-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesPatricia Gomez vs Jill Clifton6-2, 6-2
2025-10-14vs Currie-McGhee - Smash SistersWon 21
L#1 SinglesGrace Doss vs Barbara Durso6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesNeha Jain vs Gayle Sturdivant6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesMary Grace Seneris vs Leanne Currie-McGhee3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-10-07vs Currie-McGhee - Smash SistersLost 02
L#2 SinglesJennifer Rawlings vs Gayle Sturdivant2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesPatricia Gomez vs Leanne Currie-McGhee5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Singles Weeknight 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Grace Doss
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.89
Neha Jain
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.85
Jennifer Rawlings
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.82
Mary Grace Seneris
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.74
Liberty Gerescher
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.65
Mariel McClung
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.52
Patricia Gomez
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Grace Doss
11W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Neha Jain
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
Jennifer Rawlings
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Mary Grace Seneris
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Liberty Gerescher
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.74
Mariel McClung
8W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
Patricia Gomez
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.