Teams

Oldies but Goodies

2024 65 and OVER - BOISE · TV

8 players · average NTRP 3.58 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-28vs Idaho/Allen/65&Over8.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesJames Elliott / Terry Pape vs Jeffrey Henken / Russell Moorhead0-6, 1-6
2024-08-19vs Idaho/Allen/65&Over8.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesSteve Anderson / Terry Pape vs Daniel Friend / Robert Welch3-6, 3-6
2024-08-14vs Idaho/Allen/65&Over8.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesTerry Pape / Peter Bliss vs Buckner Harris / Jeff Seals1-6, 0-6
2024-08-12vs Idaho/Allen/65&Over8.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesTerry Pape / Anthony Saulino vs Buckner Harris / Jeff Seals0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Allen/65&Over8.0M6118310115
2Oldies but Goodies1631837220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Jeffrey Trask
published 4
3.34
Anthony Saulino
published 3.5
3.28
James Elliott
published 3.5
Fritz Durham
published 3.5
3.15
Lynn Coltrin
published 3.5
2.95
Jay Blackford
published 3.5
Peter Bliss
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Terry Pape
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Elliott + Jay Blackford5555% games+5.3% vs expected
Jay Blackford + Anthony Saulino61045% games+5.0% vs expected
Lynn Coltrin + James Elliott71345% games−12.5% vs expected
James Elliott + Anthony Saulino10559% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Coltrin + Anthony Saulino6354% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Coltrin + Jay Blackford4261% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Coltrin + Fritz Durham1539% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Coltrin + Jeffrey Trask2445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeffrey Trask
45W–49L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.87
3.5
Anthony Saulino
112W–62L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
James Elliott
95W–93L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Fritz Durham
85W–91L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Lynn Coltrin
87W–108L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Jay Blackford
39W–46L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
Peter Bliss
13W–10L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Terry Pape
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.