Teams

BAY TREES PK 55AW7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Nora Hart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Danielle Duperly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Cecile Chenevey
published 4
3.57
Tuesdai Powers
published
3.25
Nancy Blom
published
3.23
Lula Burnett
published
3.15
Barbara Brooks
published 3.5
3.11
Michelle Weiss
published
3.09
Allie Fralick
published 3
3.07
Julie Lowe
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Laura Herbert
published
2.93
Linda Duchscherer
published
2.85
Traci Rebiejo
published
Mary Akli
published
Mayra Dominguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Duperly + Nora Hart16557% games+0.6% vs expected
Michelle Weiss + Tuesdai Powers213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nora Hart
39W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Danielle Duperly
39W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Cecile Chenevey
17W–24L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Tuesdai Powers
24W–30L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Nancy Blom
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Lula Burnett
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Barbara Brooks
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Michelle Weiss
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Allie Fralick
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Julie Lowe
118W–102L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.07
Laura Herbert
14W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Linda Duchscherer
24W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Traci Rebiejo
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Mary Akli
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mayra Dominguez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.