Teams

Busby

2024 FW Tri-Level · Womens 4.0-4.5-5.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-03vs CooperLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Coburn / Lauren Gremminger vs Carla Cooper / Meaghan Ocanas1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCorrine Quast / Cherrie Ibbott vs Teresa Merklin / Jody Hassemer2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChelsea James / Andree Kale vs Sandi Shipley / Martha Davis6-1, 6-4
2024-11-02vs CooperLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Coburn / Linley Busby vs Carla Cooper / Chrissie Cooper1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelinda Mooney / Corrine Quast vs Brooke Cabianca / Jody Hassemer4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLeslie Eugenio / Andree Kale vs Mozhdeh Asadidezfouli / Martha Davis6-2, 6-4
2024-11-01vs CooperWon 30
W#1 DoublesLynsie Jones / Melissa Coburn vs Chrissie Cooper / Meaghan Ocanas7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Jacobi / Vanessa Kelley vs Brooke Cabianca / Teresa Merklin5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndree Kale / Chelsea James vs Mozhdeh Asadidezfouli / Sandi Shipley6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 4.0-4.5-5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Corrine Quast
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Chelsea James
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Vanessa Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.07
Laura Jacobi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Cherrie Ibbott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Melinda Mooney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Andree Kale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Leslie Eugenio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Gremminger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Linley Busby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lynsie Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Coburn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Coburn + Linley Busby123 matchesnot enough data
Corrine Quast + Laura Jacobi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Corrine Quast
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Chelsea James
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
4.10
Vanessa Kelley
26W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
25%74%<1%
4.09
Laura Jacobi
15W–2L career · 1 line in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.07
4.5
Cherrie Ibbott
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
46%54%<1%
4.01
Melinda Mooney
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
89%11%<1%
3.83
4
Andree Kale
21W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Leslie Eugenio
25W–26L career · 1 line in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Lauren Gremminger
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Linley Busby
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Lynsie Jones
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Coburn
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.