Teams

Fee - Acquaviva

2025 Brevard Adult 18 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-05vs Brevard/Addagarla/18&Over3.5MLost 01
L#3 DoublesThomas Armstrong / Mark Klenck vs David Tran / Mathew Deater1-6, 0-6
2025-05-15vs Kiwi - DulayWon 10
W#3 DoublesThomas Armstrong / Mark Klenck vs David Norris / Thomas Capuano2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-24vs Brevard/Addagarla/18&Over3.5MLost 13
W#1 DoublesWILLIAM WOOD / Ivan Castillo vs David Tran / Cameron Hartnett6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnil Vadaparambil / Steve Brako vs Rohit Menghani / Hart Arnold1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesBrent Traina vs Ashish Dalal4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarl Acquaviva / Marcus Lumpkin vs David Castillo / Mathew Deater3-6, 3-6
2025-04-17vs EFSC - SimmonsLost 01
L#3 DoublesThomas Armstrong / Marcus Lumpkin vs Jamell Caswell / Deepak Ravi2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Steve Brako
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
WILLIAM WOOD
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Brent Traina
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Ruben Diaz
published
3.09
Mark Klenck
published
3.04
Gregory Kidwell
published
3.00
Thomas Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Marcus Lumpkin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Carl Acquaviva
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
Ivan Castillo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Juan Restrepo
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Armstrong + Carl Acquaviva5075% games+19.9% vs expected
Marcus Lumpkin + Mark Klenck213 matchesnot enough data
Marcus Lumpkin + WILLIAM WOOD033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steve Brako
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
WILLIAM WOOD
7W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
3.15
3.5
Brent Traina
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Ruben Diaz
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Mark Klenck
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
Gregory Kidwell
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Thomas Armstrong
66W–78L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Marcus Lumpkin
8W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Carl Acquaviva
22W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Ivan Castillo
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Juan Restrepo
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.