Teams

MPTC - Aces & Tweeners

2022 HTA Spring NA - Mixed Doubles Sunday · 9.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-27vs MPTC - AvengersWon 10
W#4 DoublesKimberly Elliott / Dimitri Ang vs Shirley Soewito / Stanley Sou6-1, 6-1
2022-03-20vs LLTC - SwingersLost 01
L#4 DoublesHenry Peng / Kimberly Elliott vs Alain Tran / XinhSylvia Le3-6, 3-6
2022-02-27vs Forest Oaks - Tennis JunkiesWon 10
W#3 DoublesKimberly Elliott / Phong Regent vs Sara Catania / Vincent Catania6-4, 6-3
2022-02-20vs MPTC - AvengersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Greenwood / Kimberly Elliott vs Cecilia Tetlow / Matthew Tetlow6-3, 6-3
2022-02-13vs LLTC - SwingersLost 01
L#2 DoublesKimberly Elliott / John Greenwood vs XinhSylvia Le / Diego Armando Casco Villalobos2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Crystal Fain
published 5
4.43
Candice Wright
published 4.5
4.27
John Greenwood
published
4.25
Dimitri Ang
published 4.5
Anna Schraer
published 4.5
Emma Nguyen
published 4.5
4.24
Tomas Huynh
published
4.23
Phong Regent
published
3.97
Kimberly Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 40% · published
Henry Peng
published 4
3.47
Thy Regent
published
Joemichael Olfindo
published
Jordan Fandry
published
Laura Fandry
published
Matt Dean
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Crystal Fain
60W–30L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.58
4.5
Candice Wright
26W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
4.43
John Greenwood
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Dimitri Ang
37W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Anna Schraer
21W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Emma Nguyen
43W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tomas Huynh
65W–25L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.24
Phong Regent
70W–29L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
Kimberly Elliott
176W–56L career · 5 lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.97
4
Henry Peng
2W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Thy Regent
22W–53L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.47
Joemichael Olfindo
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jordan Fandry
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Fandry
19W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Matt Dean
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.