Teams

KY/LEX/Silitonga

2024 USTA SINGLES LEAGUE 18 & OVER · Men 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-09-14vs KY/LEX/ShahWon 10
W#1 SinglesJared Jeffers vs Shyen Shah4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-27vs KY/LEX/IngramLost 02
L#2 SinglesBrad Faulkenberg vs Dustin Ingram6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 SinglesGreer Stone vs Gene Hilton1-6, 3-6
2024-08-18vs KY/LEX/BegleyWon 10
W#1 SinglesBrad Faulkenberg vs Tariq Arain6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-09vs KY/LEX/ShahLost 12
W#1 SinglesGreer Stone vs Shyen Shah6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAndre Silitonga vs Andres Castillo3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesEthan Heck vs Sean Stokes4-6, 2-6
2024-08-04vs KY/LEX/IngramLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrad Faulkenberg vs Caleb Ashton4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesBradley Selack vs Brent Moulton4-6, 3-6
2024-07-27vs KY/LEX/BegleyWon 21
W#1 SinglesBradley Selack vs Justin Morgan6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesGreer Stone vs Stephen Melton5-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesEthan Heck vs Dave Cunningham6-4, 6-4
2024-07-19vs KY/LEX/ShahLost 02
L#2 SinglesBradley Selack vs Shyen Shah3-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesAndre Silitonga vs Andres Castillo2-6, 3-6
2024-07-08vs KY/LEX/IngramLost 03
L#1 SinglesAndre Silitonga vs Isaac Meisner1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesGreer Stone vs Gene Hilton2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesBrad Faulkenberg vs Connor Moore5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-06-27vs KY/LEX/BegleyLost 02
L#1 SinglesBradley Selack vs Tariq Arain2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesEthan Heck vs Jake Caverly6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Men 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LEX/Ingram7220718201
2KY/LEX/Shah54141327238
3KY/LEX/Begley36101735255
4KY/LEX/Silitonga36101738271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bradley Selack
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.68
Andre Silitonga
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.68
Greer Stone
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
Brad Faulkenberg
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Ethan Heck
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Jared Jeffers
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bradley Selack
17W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Andre Silitonga
19W–42L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Greer Stone
12W–15L career · type S · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
Brad Faulkenberg
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ethan Heck
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jared Jeffers
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.