Teams

OSTC - May

2024 Singles League 18 & Over-GC · Women 4.0+

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-03vs BBTC - NicholsLost 03
L#1 SinglesAbby Chapman vs Bridget Dougherty Mendenhall6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKelsey Martin vs Angie Simmons0-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesJennifer Maisano vs Carly Nichols Coy0-6, 4-6
2024-11-11vs BBTC - NicholsLost 12
W#1 SinglesAbby Chapman vs Shelly Williams6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDelaney Adamo vs Carly Nichols Coy0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesStacie Zorn vs Trinity Henn5-7, 2-6
2024-11-05vs BBTC - NicholsLost 03
L#1 SinglesTana Cooper vs Bridget Dougherty Mendenhall4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesDelaney Adamo vs Lynette Cooper3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesStacie Zorn vs Trinity Henn3-6, 4-6
2024-10-28vs BBTC - NicholsLost 12
L#1 SinglesAbby Chapman vs Shelly Williams4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJennifer Maisano vs Angie Simmons4-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesKelsey Martin vs Bridget Dougherty Mendenhall4-6, 7-5
2024-10-22vs BBTC - NicholsLost 12
L#1 SinglesKarah Brown vs Carly Nichols Coy1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesTana Cooper vs Neely Gaddy6-3, 7-5
L#3 SinglesDelaney Adamo vs Bridget Dougherty Mendenhall0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 4.0+
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTC - Nichols50123795
2OSTC - May0531226170

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Karah Brown
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.74
Andrea May
published 4
3.64
Kelsey Martin
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.60
Tana Cooper
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.47
Jennifer Maisano
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.25
Delaney Adamo
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Kara Blevins
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.16
Stacie Zorn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Abby Chapman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelsey Martin + Andrea May4156% games+7.8% vs expected
Jennifer Maisano + Andrea May6257% games+4.8% vs expected
Kara Blevins + Jennifer Maisano6170% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karah Brown
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Andrea May
50W–36L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.74
Kelsey Martin
26W–15L career · 6 lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
Tana Cooper
30W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
Jennifer Maisano
68W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Delaney Adamo
26W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Kara Blevins
84W–54L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.18
Stacie Zorn
41W–35L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.16
Abby Chapman
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.