Teams

Twin Lakes - Smith

2023 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Tuesday · 4.5 Ladies Doubles

15 players · average NTRP 4.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Ladies Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Mary Donlon
published
4.29
Geraldine Haas
published 4.5
Cristina Petrosini
published 4.5
4.01
Renata Neaton
published
3.93
Christie Pearl
published 4.5
3.90
Jennifer Cho
published
3.84
Lindsey Bradford
published
3.83
Jeana Hur
published
3.74
Maria Horricks
published
3.64
Betsy Smith
published 4
3.60
Susanne Roemer
published
Mabel Graham
published
Mary Lou Gonzales
published
Natalie Hur
published
Valeria Murray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Cho + Jeana Hur29959% games+3.0% vs expected
Betsy Smith + Susanne Roemer71250% games+0.1% vs expected
Betsy Smith + Maria Horricks0544% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Donlon
36W–33L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Geraldine Haas
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Cristina Petrosini
21W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Renata Neaton
93W–36L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
4.01
4.5
Christie Pearl
7W–17L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.93
Jennifer Cho
71W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
Lindsey Bradford
26W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
Jeana Hur
81W–38L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
Maria Horricks
36W–33L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Betsy Smith
46W–41L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
Susanne Roemer
18W–25L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.60
Mabel Graham
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Lou Gonzales
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Natalie Hur
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Valeria Murray
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.