Teams

Chateau Elan-Watts

2025 · 26 NEGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesHeide Rudnick / Rhonda Kupka vs Lisa Lancaster / Pamela McBride7-5, 6-4
2025-09-03Won 10
W#4 DoublesHeide Rudnick / April Giometti vs Jeanne Lewis / Claudia Kempen4-6, 7-6, 6-3
2025-08-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJanet Dibenedetto / Heide Rudnick vs Christine Allen / Elizabeth Causey3-6, 4-6
2025-08-06vs Alberta Banks-CobbLost 01
L#3 DoublesHeide Rudnick / Suzanne Miller vs Karen Konsowitz / Stacy de Rogatis4-6, 6-4, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 26 NEGTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Brandy Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 94%, also #2 Doubles 6% · published 3.5
3.47
Sonya Watts
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
3.38
TAMARA MAELLARO
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.37
Kathy Fauscett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Erica Cahoon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.33
Heide Rudnick
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.32
Garol Orr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Jennifer Bestermann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
Christine McClendon
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.30
Liz Murphy
usually #4 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.21
Janet Dibenedetto
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
3.06
Suzanne Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Melissa Almon
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.92
Jennifer Fuller
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
2.86
April Giometti
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Michelle Calvert
published
Rhonda Kupka
usually #4 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine McClendon + Jennifer Fuller6453% games+4.0% vs expected
Brandy Bailey + TAMARA MAELLARO10654% games+1.9% vs expected
Christine McClendon + Erica Cahoon4252% games+0.5% vs expected
Janet Dibenedetto + Jennifer Bestermann3252% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Almon + Heide Rudnick314 matchesnot enough data
Sonya Watts + Brandy Bailey134 matchesnot enough data
Brandy Bailey + Jennifer Fuller404 matchesnot enough data
Brandy Bailey + Kathy Fauscett314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brandy Bailey
30W–12L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
Sonya Watts
27W–18L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.47
TAMARA MAELLARO
25W–19L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
Kathy Fauscett
10W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Erica Cahoon
25W–17L career · 15 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
Heide Rudnick
32W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Garol Orr
12W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Jennifer Bestermann
9W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Christine McClendon
19W–17L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Liz Murphy
14W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Janet Dibenedetto
23W–25L career · 10 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Suzanne Miller
31W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
Melissa Almon
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.04
Jennifer Fuller
22W–12L career · 11 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
April Giometti
31W–36L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
Michelle Calvert
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhonda Kupka
15W–25L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.