Teams

MMcCullough-DUR

2026 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-01vs SGraff2.5-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesVirginia Wang / Sophia Ewing vs Alexandra Ferrari / Lauren Lawson7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMegan McCullough vs Wenjia Yang6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAmanda Laird / Natalie Liller vs Jasmine Hemmings / Amanda Girkin7-5, 6-3
2026-04-24vs RLatson-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnaliese Gresham / Susanne Schmal vs Emily Patulski / Khelsey Lemon1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesKellie Johnson vs Amy Singer2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Kim / Virginia Wang vs Kim Rice / Rachel Latson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-04-17vs NZhang-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesSophia Ewing / Susan Kim vs Yuejun Xu / Songyang Zhang6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Selina Jing1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMegan McCullough / Annaliese Gresham vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-10vs KZeph-CHTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesVirginia Wang / Annaliese Gresham vs Amelia Maytan / Junga Han7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKellie Johnson vs Anne Sherman0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Kim / Courtney Van Houtven vs Beth Gifford / Joanna Bomberg3-6, 3-6
2026-03-20vs JRanheim-TOCHWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusanne Schmal / Amanda Laird vs Nora Mishriky / Sarah Mangels7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMegan McCullough vs Alison Riddoch6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNatalie Liller / Courtney Van Houtven vs Suma Suswaram / Johannah Maynor6-3, 6-1
2026-03-09vs APerry-HVCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMegan McCullough / Sophia Ewing vs Nicole Grant / Anne Lucas6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKellie Johnson vs Maria Behan6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAmanda Laird / Virginia Wang vs Cindi White / Kimberly Vandermeer6-4, 6-3
2026-03-06vs GArriagada-HRLost 02
L#1 DoublesSophia Ewing / Kellie Johnson vs Athena Samaras / Constanza de Radcliffe6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCourtney Van Houtven / Natalie Liller vs Sarah Johnston / Christina Kline7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-02-20vs MPruette-CCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnnaliese Gresham / Courtney Van Houtven vs Lauren Hertzog / Kathy Sweeney6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSophia Ewing vs Kimberly Cundiff6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 18 Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KZeph-CHTC5213817136
2MMcCullough-DUR5315919173
3NZhang-DUR5316820179
4GArriagada-HR35101432235
5SGraff2.5-DUR3571735239
6MPruette-CCC2571428188
7APerry-HVCC0832142266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Sophia Ewing
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 13% · published
2.68
Megan McCullough
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.57
Kellie Johnson
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.54
Susanne Schmal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.40
Amanda Laird
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.38
Annaliese Gresham
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 2.5
2.31
Virginia Wang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.27
Courtney Van Houtven
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Laird + Megan McCullough224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophia Ewing
33W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.78
Megan McCullough
23W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.68
Kellie Johnson
18W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.57
2.5
Susanne Schmal
61W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
2.5
Amanda Laird
16W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.40
2.5
Annaliese Gresham
70W–81L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.38
Virginia Wang
14W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Courtney Van Houtven
3W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.