Teams

Longa (Salvadore Park)

2024 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 3.5 Adult Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.36 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Laura Naramore
published
3.30
Monica Roelandse
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 10% · published
3.27
Elisabeth Eljuri
published
3.25
CLAUDIA LAGRANGE
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Jenifer Longa
usually #4 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.15
Esther Slazas
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Sandra Raynaud
published
3.11
SONIA DACORTE
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Beatriz Morales
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Diana Norniella-Burke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Lourdes Gray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.88
Maria Basterra
usually #1 Singles 85%, also #2 Doubles 15% · published 3
2.88
Myrna Leal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Mariela Rojas
published
2.74
Maria Llopiz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Roelandse + CLAUDIA LAGRANGE3352% games+5.2% vs expected
Myrna Leal + Jenifer Longa51144% games+4.5% vs expected
Monica Roelandse + Lourdes Gray182049% games−0.6% vs expected
SONIA DACORTE + Jenifer Longa193048% games−3.0% vs expected
Diana Norniella-Burke + Lourdes Gray21133% gamesnot enough data
Diana Norniella-Burke + Jenifer Longa4841% gamesnot enough data
Esther Slazas + Jenifer Longa4545% gamesnot enough data
Beatriz Morales + Esther Slazas2644% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Naramore
17W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
Monica Roelandse
111W–112L career · 10 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Elisabeth Eljuri
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
CLAUDIA LAGRANGE
37W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Jenifer Longa
142W–163L career · 7 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Esther Slazas
54W–119L career · 6 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
Sandra Raynaud
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
SONIA DACORTE
57W–84L career · 3 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Beatriz Morales
93W–111L career · 6 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Diana Norniella-Burke
37W–96L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.95
3.5
Lourdes Gray
40W–96L career · 8 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Maria Basterra
112W–142L career · 13 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
2.88
Myrna Leal
54W–115L career · 2 lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.88
Mariela Rojas
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.79
Maria Llopiz
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.