Teams

Selma Williams

2025 Selma Southern Combo Doubles 18's · Women's 5.5

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-01vs SE 5.5W 18&Over BergeronLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlicia Beers / Noelle Rich vs Murphy Shifferd / Taylor Hale2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKendall Smith / Mallory Kelley vs Catherine Thomas / Sydney Wood6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Marcengill / Morgan Bearden vs Jennifer Rowell Jones / Laigan Bearden5-7, 4-6
2025-09-29vs SE 5.5W 18&Over BergeronLost 03
L#1 DoublesMolly Williams / Kendall Smith vs Jennifer Dobbs / Maegan Austin2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlicia Beers / Noelle Rich vs Kennedy Bergeron / Murphy Shifferd7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Marcengill / Morgan Bearden vs Taylor Hale / Elizabeth Burford5-7, 4-6
2025-09-22vs SE 5.5W 18&Over BergeronLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Marcengill / Morgan Bearden vs Kennedy Bergeron / Sydney Wood4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKendall Smith / Mallory Kelley vs Jennifer Rowell Jones / Laigan Bearden5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-21vs SE 5.5W 18&Over BergeronLost 03
L#1 DoublesMolly Williams / Mallory Kelley vs Taylor Hale / Murphy Shifferd4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlicia Beers / Noelle Rich vs Catherine Thomas / Maegan Austin4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMorgan Bearden / Kendall Smith vs Jennifer Dobbs / Laigan Bearden3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alicia Beers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Mallory Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Marcengill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Molly Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Morgan Bearden
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Noelle Rich
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alicia Beers + Noelle Rich033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Marcengill + Morgan Bearden033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alicia Beers
3W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mallory Kelley
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Marcengill
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Molly Williams
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Morgan Bearden
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Noelle Rich
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.