Teams

Johnson/Downs-3.0 NC

2025 Singles League 18&Over-NC · Women 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-16vs MCKIMWon 30
W#1 SinglesHoustyn Loosier vs Candace Kautzky6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTarshian Moon vs Michelle McKim6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesPam Johnson vs Peyton Walker6-3, 6-2
2025-11-15vs Tomlinson - NCWon 20
W#1 SinglesShea Young vs Renie Bumpous6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesTarshian Moon vs Tammy Smalley4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-11-13vs MCKIMWon 30
W#1 SinglesShea Young vs Samantha Phillips6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesHoustyn Loosier vs Jennifer Doyle6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesPam Johnson vs Candace Kautzky7-6, 7-6
2025-11-12vs MCKIMWon 21
W#1 SinglesTarshian Moon vs Stephanie White4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMaggie Neal vs Ruth Potter6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesTammy Downs vs Kim Yount4-6, 2-6
2025-11-11vs Tomlinson - NCWon 21
W#1 SinglesTarshian Moon vs Amasa Lacy7-6, 7-5
W#2 SinglesShea Young vs Tammy Smalley6-4, 6-0
L#3 SinglesMaggie Neal vs Maray McIntyre4-6, 2-6
2025-11-04vs Tomlinson - NCWon 21
W#1 SinglesDevra Hampton vs Amasa Lacy6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMaggie Neal vs Renie Bumpous4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesHoustyn Loosier vs WENDY Vines6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Shea Young
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.97
Devra Hampton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.68
Tarshian Moon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.67
Houstyn Loosier
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.62
Maggie Neal
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.56
Pam Johnson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.45
Tammy Downs
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pam Johnson + Tammy Downs51243% games+3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shea Young
62W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.08
3
Devra Hampton
31W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Tarshian Moon
31W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
Houstyn Loosier
33W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%12%88%
2.67
Maggie Neal
20W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Pam Johnson
34W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56
Tammy Downs
27W–50L career · 1 line in 2025
0%64%36%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.