Teams

Yadkin/Tatum-White/4.5-4.0-3.5 Tri Level Friday Evenings

2026 Yadkin Valley Tri-Level 18 & Over · Women 4.5-4.0-3.5 - Friday Evening

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-26vs Yadkin/Westwood/18+4.0.3.5.3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Rash / Bridget Anderson vs Lauren Gandhi / Jocelyn Moye6-1, 6-3
2026-07-19vs Yadkin/Westwood/18+4.0.3.5.3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Messner / Tiffany Rash vs Jill Bowman / Wendy Price1-6, 3-6
2026-07-05vs Yadkin/Westwood/18+4.0.3.5.3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Gregory / Tiffany Rash vs Lauren Gandhi / Jocelyn Moye6-3, 6-3
2026-06-28vs Yadkin/Westwood/18+4.0.3.5.3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesHolly Hinshelwood / Bridget Anderson vs Leanne Groban / Lauren Gandhi6-2, 6-0
2026-06-21vs Yadkin/Westwood/18+4.0.3.5.3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Messner / Holly Hinshelwood vs Wendy Price / Leanne Groban3-6, 3-6
2026-06-14vs Yadkin/Westwood/18+4.0.3.5.3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesBridget Anderson / Holly Hinshelwood vs Wendy Price / Jill Bowman6-0, 6-4
2026-06-07vs Yadkin/Westwood/18+4.0.3.5.3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPaige Reilly / Tiffany Rash vs Leanne Groban / Jocelyn Moye1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Women 4.5-4.0-3.5 - Friday Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Yadkin/Tatum-White/4.5-4.0-3.5 Tri Level Friday Evenings000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Molly Ehrig
published
4.05
Caroline Downs
published 4.5
3.98
Jessica Bair-Epps
published
3.90
Whitney Ellis
published
3.87
Robin Lindner
published
3.87
Layne Saunders
published
3.87
Tiffany Rash
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.86
Holly Hinshelwood
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Kimberly Busse
published
3.65
Hannah Giles
published
3.52
Clarissa Tatum
published 3.5
3.47
Meghan de Young
published
3.34
JoAnn White
published
3.27
Katie Thompson
published
Laura Buchanan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Clarissa Tatum + JoAnn White5083% gamesnot enough data
Meghan de Young + Clarissa Tatum314 matchesnot enough data
Clarissa Tatum + Tiffany Rash213 matchesnot enough data
Clarissa Tatum + Hannah Giles303 matchesnot enough data
JoAnn White + Hannah Giles303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Ehrig
25W–8L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Caroline Downs
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
4.05
Jessica Bair-Epps
16W–18L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.98
Whitney Ellis
48W–27L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Robin Lindner
16W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
Layne Saunders
151W–74L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
Tiffany Rash
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
Holly Hinshelwood
23W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
Kimberly Busse
18W–17L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Hannah Giles
36W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.65
3.5
Clarissa Tatum
59W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
Meghan de Young
43W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
JoAnn White
38W–22L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Katie Thompson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Laura Buchanan
9W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.