Teams

X55 7.0 TP Fox

2023 NEOTA Mixed 55 & Over Fall · NEOTA 7.0 55&O Mixed Fall

18 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for NEOTA 7.0 55&O Mixed Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Edward Raffel
published 4
3.21
Susan Voth
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Brian Kowell
published 3.5
3.10
John Consilio
published
3.01
Joan Kerosky
published
2.92
Cynthia Rhyner
published 3.5
2.79
Brian Lambright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ann Lynch
published 3
2.75
Ron Novak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Karen Lahovich
published
2.62
Janel Ciolli
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Gail Wilkes
published
Joe Lahovich
published
Keith Amtsberg
published
Lori Young
published
Michael Karder
published
Michelle Fox
published
Scott Wilkes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janel Ciolli + John Consilio6352% games+9.9% vs expected
Michelle Fox + Brian Lambright1733% games−4.3% vs expected
Lori Young + Brian Lambright21040% gamesnot enough data
Ann Lynch + Brian Lambright4645% gamesnot enough data
Joe Lahovich + Karen Lahovich0931% gamesnot enough data
Janel Ciolli + Ron Novak4347% gamesnot enough data
Scott Wilkes + Gail Wilkes3247% gamesnot enough data
Ann Lynch + Ron Novak044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edward Raffel
36W–68L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.63
Susan Voth
84W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Brian Kowell
17W–23L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12
John Consilio
116W–87L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
Joan Kerosky
120W–106L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Cynthia Rhyner
135W–114L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Brian Lambright
84W–158L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Ann Lynch
72W–120L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ron Novak
89W–144L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Karen Lahovich
60W–125L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
Janel Ciolli
108W–133L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.62
Gail Wilkes
28W–17L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Joe Lahovich
1W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Keith Amtsberg
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Young
67W–63L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Karder
0W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Fox
59W–136L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Wilkes
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.