Teams

Vanguard

2026 18&Over Mixed Queens · 7.0 Mixed

15 players · average NTRP 3.12 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-10vs Lopez/DamarasinguLost 03
L#1 DoublesEdward Ying Jr / Emily Cheng vs Bradley Lopez / Hayley Radachi3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEugene Chin / Karen Ledoux vs Kenneth Barretto / Gianlucca Araneta2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVernon Patrick / Vicky Quim vs David Alfonso / Willow Liu3-6, 3-6
2026-04-02vs BhagwagarLost 03
L#1 DoublesSamuel Wong / Chrysanne Marzan vs JEHAN BHAGWAGAR / Argine Choremi4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGarvin Mui / Emily Cheng vs Rao Hassan / Claude Anne Grazioli1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVernon Patrick / Dana Chan vs Rahul Pant / Cathy Wang2-6, 1-6
2026-03-28vs Taur/WuLost 03
L#1 DoublesVicky Quim / Magdiel Garcia vs Reena Yuan / Richard Lun5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDana Chan / Eugene Chin vs Donna Hahn / Andrew Min3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEmily Cheng / Michael Chan vs Lena Wu / David Taur2-6, 1-6
2026-03-23vs Tennis ElbowsLost 12
L#1 DoublesDana Chan / Jason Vinoles vs Miki Ohtomo / Max Dall'Orso6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMagdiel Garcia / Vicky Quim vs Todd Thurston / Rie Bohn6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJaeyoung Choi / Emily Cheng vs Lysa Scarselli / Vikram D'Mello3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-15vs Shi/XieLost 03
L#1 DoublesJason Vinoles / Dana Chan vs Xiaoming Shi / Susan Lee1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSamuel Wong / Chrysanne Marzan vs RONALD MARTINEZ / Aki Bowman2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEdward Ying Jr / Crystal Zhang vs Anh Nguyen / Julien Li2-6, 2-6
2026-03-05vs Queens: Valdellon/OgataLost 03
L#1 DoublesEugene Chin / Karen Ledoux vs Andrew Teng / Meiko Boynton1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGarvin Mui / Crystal Zhang vs James Cai / Diana Sisiruca3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSamuel Wong / Dana Chan vs Eric Zhu / Sophia Yang0-6, 1-6
2026-02-09vs Concrete Court JungleLost 03
L#1 DoublesEdward Ying Jr / Vicky Quim vs Maggie Zhang / Lenny Li0-6, 2-4
L#2 DoublesDana Chan / Garvin Mui vs Summer Than / John Papa1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCrystal Zhang / Michael Chan vs Melody Peng / James Mao0-6, 1-3
2026-01-11vs LekserLost 12
L#1 DoublesVernon Patrick / Dana Chan vs Tariq Habib / Therese Stowell1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Peng / Crystal Zhang vs Isaac Halpern / Lina Lekser1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJaeyoung Choi / Karen Ledoux vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-01-04vs Ishizawa/AsheLost 12
W#1 DoublesVernon Patrick / Vicky Quim vs Stephanie Miao / David Miller6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDana Chan / Eugene Chin vs Takako Kawana / Edward Hong2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Ledoux / John Peng vs Krish Puri / Fumie Ishizawa5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Jason Vinoles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Chrysanne Marzan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.73
Dana Chan
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.71
Crystal Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Karen Ledoux
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
Edward Ying Jr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Emily Cheng
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Eugene Chin
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Garvin Mui
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jaeyoung Choi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Peng
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Magdiel Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Samuel Wong
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Vernon Patrick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Vicky Quim
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Ledoux + Eugene Chin1429% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Vinoles
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
3.5
Chrysanne Marzan
57W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.11
3
Dana Chan
0W–8L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Crystal Zhang
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Karen Ledoux
150W–156L career · 7 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
Edward Ying Jr
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Emily Cheng
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Eugene Chin
6W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Garvin Mui
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jaeyoung Choi
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
John Peng
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Magdiel Garcia
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Samuel Wong
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vernon Patrick
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Vicky Quim
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.