Teams

Wang/Guedon/18/2.5/NON/CP

2026 NO Adult 18 & Over - Women Night · 2.5 NO (18&O) Women Night

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-27vs Slaton-Devall/18/2.5/NON/CPWon 30
W#1 DoublesPatricia Borges / Bridget Falcon-villa vs Megan Misko / Stacy Boue6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKathryn Guedon vs Laura Thomas6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGrace Macdougall / Maria Landry vs Susan Dinneen / Kimberly Ellis7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-22vs James/18/2.5/NON/CPWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Wang / Maryanne Purcell vs Sara James / Caroline Schulenberg7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKathryn Guedon vs Erin Haik6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGrace Macdougall / Kimiko Ichikawa vs Amanda Malachowski / Lindsay Nye1-6, 2-6
2026-04-14vs Muscenti/ 18/2.5/NON/CPWon 21
W#1 DoublesPatricia Borges / Kathryn Guedon vs Amanda Begue / Brittany Graffagnini6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMary Kathryn Sanders vs Genevieve Comfort6-6
W#2 DoublesBridget Falcon-villa / Maria Landry vs Leigh Riley / Kelly Laws6-4, 7-5
2026-04-06vs Kang/18/2.5/NON/XUSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Wang / Kathryn Guedon vs Jennifer Toups / Madison McCall6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMary Kathryn Sanders vs Kayla Smith4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-25vs Boyd/18/2.5/NON/CPWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Wang / Kathryn Guedon vs Natalie John / Larissa Millet6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMary Kathryn Sanders vs Alita Caparotta6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBridget Falcon-villa / Maryanne Purcell vs Elizabeth Boyd / Elizabeth Meeks4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-17vs Ackerman/18/2.5/NON/CPLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Wang / Kathryn Guedon vs Elizabeth Hyman / Sarah MacCurdy6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLeia Saltzman vs Sarah Malone0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBridget Falcon-villa / Maria Landry vs Emily Eustis / Dina Mcevoy5-7, 0-6
2026-03-10vs Nickels/Mayfield/18/2.5/NON/CPWon 21
W#1 DoublesBridget Falcon-villa / Kathryn Guedon vs Jennifer Mayfield / Jennifer Caccciatore6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMary Kathryn Sanders vs Sofia Martinez6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMaryanne Purcell / Grace Macdougall vs Alexis Miranne / Gabriel Virdure0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 2.5 NO (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ackerman/18/2.5/NON/CP6117411118
2Wang/Guedon/18/2.5/NON/CP6114717161
3Kang/18/2.5/NON/XU5213818145
4Boyd/18/2.5/NON/CP4312922174
5Slaton-Devall/18/2.5/NON/CP4391225187
6Muscenti/ 18/2.5/NON/CP2581331223
7James/18/2.5/NON/CP1661531208
8Nickels/Mayfield/18/2.5/NON/CP0751633235

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.63
Patricia Borges
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Kathryn Guedon
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
2.45
Mary Kathryn Sanders
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.44
Bridget Falcon-villa
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.34
Karen Wang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.16
Maryanne Purcell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.14
Maria Landry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.03
Grace Macdougall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kimiko Ichikawa
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Leia Saltzman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Wang + Kathryn Guedon303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patricia Borges
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%17%83%
2.63
Kathryn Guedon
8W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%41%59%
2.53
Mary Kathryn Sanders
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
2.5
Bridget Falcon-villa
7W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.44
Karen Wang
5W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Maryanne Purcell
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Maria Landry
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Grace Macdougall
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Kimiko Ichikawa
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Leia Saltzman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.