Teams

ELW Queen Bees

2023 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 4.0 W Saturday

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-06-10vs Seminole Lake RhodesLost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Regina Hlapatsos vs Debbie Kane / Elizabeth Sinatra6-7, 2-6
2023-06-03vs Pinellas/Abrams/40&Over4.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Cheryll Carollo vs Karen Abrams / Christina Dausch4-6, 6-7
2023-05-20vs Innisbrook VogeleyLost 02
L#1 DoublesTiffany Amesbury / Laura Hungiville vs Michele Vogeley / Diane Griffin4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSigrid Bratic / Suzanne Pedone vs Linda Thomson / Deena Walter1-6, 1-6
2023-05-13vs McMullen RomeroWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryll Carollo / Laura Hungiville vs Joann Suyao / Stacey Koval5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-07vs Seminole Lake RhodesWon 20
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Pedone / Sigrid Bratic vs Chieko Perry / JoAnn Lind4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Teresa Orr vs Tiffany Rhodes / Debbie Beardsley1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-06vs McMullen SanchezSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJudy Carlin / Laura Hungiville vs Jenny Hughes / Laurie Smith5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSigrid Bratic vs Shannon Deck6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-22vs Pinellas/Abrams/40&Over4.0WLost 02
L#1 SinglesSigrid Bratic vs Thuy Duong2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Robyn Wittleder vs Becky Ogburn / Jennifer Price2-6, 3-6
2023-04-15vs Innisbrook VogeleyWon 10
W#1 SinglesSigrid Bratic vs Jean Cantu6-4, 7-5
2023-04-08vs McMullen SanchezLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Sherry Miller vs Jenny Hughes / Laurie Smith3-6, 1-6
2023-04-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesSigrid Bratic vs Maria Suarez1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Sonya Tobeck
published 4
3.84
Sigrid Bratic
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.81
Cheryll Carollo
published 4
3.67
Helene Newsome
published 4
3.30
Laura Hungiville
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Mary Raimondo
published
Regina Hlapatsos
published
Sherry Miller
published
Teresa Orr
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sonya Tobeck
31W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Sigrid Bratic
124W–65L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Cheryll Carollo
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Helene Newsome
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Laura Hungiville
67W–119L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Mary Raimondo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Regina Hlapatsos
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherry Miller
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Teresa Orr
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.