Teams

AU - Peterson

USTA Adult League 65 & Over · 4.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AU - Peterson000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
David Gunter
published 4
3.65
Bret Peterson
published 4
3.65
Michael Gunter
published
3.62
Eric Shore
published 4
3.60
Douglas Counter
published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Gunter
9W–4L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Bret Peterson
11W–11L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.65
Michael Gunter
11W–5L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Eric Shore
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Douglas Counter
23W–14L career · no lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.