Teams

WNCM Padgett (ARC South)

Adult 55 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 55+ Adult Women 3.5 Sun

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-03vs WNCS Fitzmaurice (Peachtree)Won 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Hile / Carolyn Marzendorfer vs Susan Fitzmaurice / Alice Robbins6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesZsuzsanna Brooks / MARY PADGETT vs Jennifer Kersey / Rita Stroud5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeridith Elliott Powell / Fiona Teague vs Ronda Champion / Melissa Coles4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-26vs WNCP McClurkin (HRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMaki Goskowicz / Lisbeth Scharf vs Cynthia Boyle / Dottie Mattern6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Marzendorfer / Diane Miller vs Susan Baum / Jodi Grabowski3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Dolbow / Zsuzsanna Brooks vs Sally Gauntlett / Jennifer Profili6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-19vs WNCM Wiener (ARC South)Won 21
W#1 DoublesFiona Teague / Scott Abernethy vs Cheryl Melnyk / Emily Paterson6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMeridith Elliott Powell / Cindy Hile vs Eleanor Thompson / Jill Champlin3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMARY PADGETT / Maria Dolbow vs Karen King / Elizabeth Brown1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-04-12vs WNCG Anderson (HRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Hile / Carolyn Marzendorfer vs Karen Watson / LOUISA HARRISON6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesZsuzsanna Brooks / Diane Miller vs Elizabeth McCormick / Gina Fair6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Abernethy / MARY PADGETT vs Liz Carson / Anna Kemper6-1, 6-0
2026-04-04vs WNCS Vittoria (ARC South)Won 30
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Marzendorfer / Lisbeth Scharf vs Nancy Gray / Barbara Howarth6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesZsuzsanna Brooks / MARY PADGETT vs Kelley Stines / Trish Smith6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Dolbow / Maki Goskowicz vs Sammie Vittoria / Virginia Scarola6-0, 6-0
2026-03-22vs WNCB Cook (HRC)Won 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Hile / Fiona Teague vs Brenda Cook / ALICIA KUBIDA6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesZsuzsanna Brooks / Meridith Elliott Powell vs Jennifer Hudgens / Brenda Bowie1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMaki Goskowicz / Scott Abernethy vs Loretta Arrington / TLynn Gilpin6-2, 6-1
2026-03-15vs WNCA Rardin (Aston Park)Won 21
W#1 DoublesScott Abernethy / Maki Goskowicz vs Marie Cowan / Bedford Lally6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMARY PADGETT / Fiona Teague vs Sallie LaChance / Catalina Knutson1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Marzendorfer / Lisbeth Scharf vs MJ Baxter / Lisa Young6-2, 6-4
2026-03-08vs WNCB Brown (ARC South)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMARY PADGETT / Zsuzsanna Brooks vs Susan Burns / Linda Steele4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaria Dolbow / Lisbeth Scharf vs Jane Baird / Karen Henson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCindy Hile / Carolyn Marzendorfer vs Debbie Berry / Tammy Wrenn6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55+ Adult Women 3.5 Sun have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Maki Goskowicz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Scott Abernethy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Cindy Hile
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
MARY PADGETT
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Fiona Teague
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.24
Meridith Elliott Powell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Carolyn Marzendorfer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Lisbeth Scharf
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Maria Dolbow
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Zsuzsanna Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.00
Kathryn Drake
published
Karen Hardy
published
Nancy Izzo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Hile + Carolyn Marzendorfer4252% games−5.4% vs expected
Nancy Izzo + Lisbeth Scharf134 matchesnot enough data
MARY PADGETT + Zsuzsanna Brooks224 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Hile + Fiona Teague213 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Marzendorfer + Lisbeth Scharf213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Maki Goskowicz
72W–34L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Scott Abernethy
10W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Cindy Hile
14W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
MARY PADGETT
14W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Fiona Teague
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
Meridith Elliott Powell
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Carolyn Marzendorfer
7W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Lisbeth Scharf
11W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Maria Dolbow
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Zsuzsanna Brooks
21W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Kathryn Drake
3W–7L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Karen Hardy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Izzo
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.