Teams

Rohlinger/Memphis

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 2.5 18 & Over Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.80 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-08-09vs Fairchild/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesMeredith Philips / Lindsay Miklos vs Beth Price / Savannah Burton6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSamantha Rohlinger / Aimee Puryear vs Emily Rainey / Greer Moyes6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAllison Webb / Danielle Muntean vs Lesley Patel / Krista Hendrix6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Ashley Akil
published 3
2.63
Danielle Muntean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Monica Burt
published
2.57
Rachel Burford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Tammy Evangelisti
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Meredith Philips
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Lindsay Miklos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Samantha Rohlinger
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.36
Aimee Puryear
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.33
Allison Webb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Akil + Monica Burt10265% games+19.2% vs expected
Lindsay Miklos + Samantha Rohlinger2542% games−2.6% vs expected
Samantha Rohlinger + Aimee Puryear314 matchesnot enough data
Allison Webb + Danielle Muntean213 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Burford + Samantha Rohlinger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ashley Akil
29W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Danielle Muntean
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
Monica Burt
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.60
Rachel Burford
26W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
0%31%69%
2.57
Tammy Evangelisti
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
Meredith Philips
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Lindsay Miklos
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
Samantha Rohlinger
22W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
3
Aimee Puryear
7W–14L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.36
2.5
Allison Webb
9W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Christine Meisenheimer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.