Teams

LVTA RED

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - NOCO · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-31vs MLF ORANGELost 13
W#1 SinglesJake Hebert vs Robert Sullivan7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesWilliam Donkersgoed / David Sampson vs Danial Lewis / Jasjot Johar6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDave Trammell vs Mustafa Mohamad4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBrian Hamill / Mark Christensen vs John Fruhwirth / James Cooper4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-05-26vs CSULost 14
L#1 DoublesDave Trammell / William Donkersgoed vs Aaron Carta / Wade Bontempo3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMatthew Gallegos vs Jeff Arnett3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Sampson / Mark Christensen vs Luis Mata / Shane Miller3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTJ Mccall vs Zach Flake4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJake Hebert / Brian Hamill vs William Brothers / Mike Keefe6-2, 6-3
2022-05-17vs HMTCWon 32
L#1 DoublesRob Davis / TJ Mccall vs Nick Hansen / Steve Weber4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMatthew Gallegos vs Crip Erickson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBrian Hamill / David Sampson vs Marco Sampaio / Greg Grote6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJake Hebert vs Wyatt Baier6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesWilliam Donkersgoed / Mark Christensen vs KIPP B / Brad Hutchings6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-05-10vs MLF BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesTJ Mccall / Brian Hamill vs Chris Fergen / James Dyer1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMatthew Gallegos vs Robert Woodmansee6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDave Trammell / William Donkersgoed vs Thomas Kissler / Bryan Short1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Sampson / Mark Christensen vs Timothy Crosh / Bo Viger6-1, 7-5
2022-05-03vs LVTA PURPLEWon 32
W#1 DoublesRob Davis / TJ Mccall vs Joe Turco / Dennis Tralmer6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMatthew Gallegos vs Stephen Moritz0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrian Hamill / Dave Trammell vs Jason Boxerman / Kurt Rinne2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesJake Hebert vs Kenny Wiszt6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWilliam Donkersgoed / David Sampson vs Tamlin McDonald / Thomas Cravens6-3, 6-2
2022-04-26vs FCCC GREENLost 14
L#1 DoublesTJ Mccall / Rob Davis vs Mark Koepke / Jeffrey Beaton2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMatthew Gallegos vs Thomas Shanley6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDave Trammell / David Sampson vs Greg Lammons / Neal McConnellogue3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJake Hebert vs James Lautzenheiser7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWilliam Donkersgoed / Mark Christensen vs David Shigekane / Springer Browne1-6, 6-7
2022-04-19vs FCCC NAVYLost 23
L#1 DoublesRob Davis / Brian Hamill vs Joseph Hannah / Daniel Brown3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMatthew Gallegos vs Austin Kelly6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Donkersgoed / Dave Trammell vs Joseph Basta / Christopher Bee6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJake Hebert vs Kevin Brookfield6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMark Christensen / David Sampson vs Jon Clay / Jeffrey McClure1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jake Hebert
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.09
Brian Hamill
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.81
Dave Trammell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
David Sampson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Matthew Gallegos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Rob Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
TJ Mccall
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
William Donkersgoed
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Hamill + Dave Trammell4742% games+5.9% vs expected
Rob Davis + William Donkersgoed2452% games+5.2% vs expected
Brian Hamill + William Donkersgoed1741% games−3.8% vs expected
Dave Trammell + William Donkersgoed1536% games−15.1% vs expected
David Sampson + William Donkersgoed2352% gamesnot enough data
TJ Mccall + Rob Davis224 matchesnot enough data
Brian Hamill + TJ Mccall123 matchesnot enough data
Brian Hamill + Rob Davis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jake Hebert
6W–3L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Brian Hamill
20W–31L career · 6 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Dave Trammell
17W–80L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
David Sampson
10W–9L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Gallegos
10W–5L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rob Davis
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
TJ Mccall
10W–8L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Donkersgoed
15W–44L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.