Teams

6 Avalon Luchsinger

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.21 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-09vs 4 RCC FrenchLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Edlavitch / Matthew Luchsinger vs Guillermo Pardo / Jesse Pasco0-6, 2-6
2023-07-02vs 2 Woodlake McCoyLost 01
L#1 DoublesGary Woods / Steven Edlavitch vs Ron Birnbaum / Brian Elliott6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2023-06-25vs 9 Burkwood ClarkWon 10
W#1 SinglesSteven Edlavitch vs Charlie Chien Le6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-18vs 7 Willow Oaks Boyle MathewsLost 01
L#2 DoublesSteven Edlavitch / Barry George vs Brian Ford / Roland Vetter4-6, 4-6
2023-06-11vs 5 JRHS Stephens SurgeLost 01
L#1 SinglesSteven Edlavitch vs Doug Okay6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-10vs 8 Avalon GhitaWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteven Edlavitch / Matthew Luchsinger vs Brad Williamson / Richard Bland6-4, 6-2
2023-05-25vs 3 Westwood Turton Senior WhackersWon 10
W#1 SinglesSteven Edlavitch vs Lonnie Lemco6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Chris Giacchi
published 3.5
3.49
Steven Edlavitch
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Matthew Luchsinger
published
3.16
Gregory Blouch
published 3.5
3.06
Glenn Mizrach
published 3
2.88
Rob Henley
published
2.83
David McKelvey
published 3
2.83
Gary Woods
published 3
2.72
Frank Trani
published 3
2.60
Scott Schoenborn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gary Woods + Gregory Blouch2443% gamesnot enough data
David McKelvey + Glenn Mizrach134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Giacchi
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Steven Edlavitch
122W–71L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Matthew Luchsinger
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Gregory Blouch
8W–32L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Glenn Mizrach
13W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
Rob Henley
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
David McKelvey
16W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Gary Woods
6W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Frank Trani
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
Scott Schoenborn
0W–10L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.