Teams

ESB:Queens of the Court:Smith

2024 VT Tri-Level Women · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-08vs ESB:Lobsters:Michaels/RuwetWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Durieux / Elmira Shea vs Kathryn Ruwet / Gretchen Gaida Michaels6-1, 6-0
2024-11-17vs ESB:Serve it Up:NorotskyWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Durieux / Karen Smith vs Deborah Norotsky / Mary Beth Pinard6-4, 6-3
2024-11-10vs ESB:Double Trouble:Merrill/SmithWon 10
W#1 DoublesKate Cunningham / Marsha Weisfeld vs Evelyn Norris / Liza Webster6-4, 6-4
2024-10-19vs ESB:Serve it Up:NorotskyLost 01
L#1 DoublesElmira Shea / Marsha Weisfeld vs Mary Beth Pinard / Susan Thornburg3-6, 4-6
2024-10-06vs ESB:Lobsters:Michaels/RuwetWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristin Walsh / Kate Cunningham vs Gretchen Gaida Michaels / Kathryn Ruwet6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ESB:Queens of the Court:Smith4242441
2ESB:Serve it Up:Norotsky3333652
3ESB:Double Trouble:Merrill/Smith3333760
4ESB:Lobsters:Michaels/Ruwet2424865

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Kate Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Lori Durieux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Elmira Shea
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Marsha Weisfeld
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Smith
published
Kristin Walsh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Durieux + Marsha Weisfeld5066% gamesnot enough data
Elmira Shea + Lori Durieux303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Cunningham
45W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.11
Lori Durieux
37W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Elmira Shea
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
Marsha Weisfeld
22W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
Karen Smith
1W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristin Walsh
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.