Teams

3-LLazaro-Eno

2023 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 9.5 Women Evening

13 players · average NTRP 4.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesZoe Dubrow / Paige Lloyd vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesLeslie Boesch / Jennifer Hiller vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-27vs 1-KMedynskaya-EnoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPaige Lloyd / Zoe Dubrow vs Jennifer McEntee / MaryBeth Jackson3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLeslie Boesch / MacY Fisher vs Jennifer Reese / Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade6-2, 7-5
2023-09-20vs 2-HRemley-Eno 9.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJamie Breunig / Lisa Spees vs Annie McCullough / Bren Woods3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrandy Kmiec / Anna Soffin vs Heather Remley / Julia Howard6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-09-06Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPaige Lloyd / Zoe Dubrow vs Kate Medynskaya / Anne Lyford2-6, 3-6
2023-08-30vs 2-HRemley-Eno 9.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesZoe Dubrow / Emily Callahan vs Kelly Moler Glass / Heather Remley1-6, 3-6
2023-08-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Speicher / Brandy Kmiec vs Jennifer McEntee / Anne Lyford2-6, 3-6
2023-08-09vs 2-HRemley-Eno 9.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJamie Breunig / Leslie Boesch vs Heather Remley / Annie McCullough2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 9.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
Jennifer Hiller
published
4.66
Jamie Breunig
published 5
4.64
4.43
Leslie Boesch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.35
MacY Fisher
published
4.34
Brandy Kmiec
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.34
Lisa Spees
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.23
Charlie Trinco
published 4.5
4.22
Zoe Dubrow
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.00
Emily Callahan
published 4.5
3.71
Karen Borges
published
Anna Soffin
published
Paige Lloyd
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Hiller
17W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
4.93
5
Jamie Breunig
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
4.66
5
Elizabeth Speicher
13W–21L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
4.64
4.5
Leslie Boesch
245W–102L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
4.43
MacY Fisher
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
4.35
4.5
Brandy Kmiec
107W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Lisa Spees
97W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Charlie Trinco
18W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Zoe Dubrow
101W–75L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Emily Callahan
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
4.00
Karen Borges
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Anna Soffin
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Paige Lloyd
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.