Teams

Fred Wells Sollenberger 10:30am

2023 Women's Daytime Doubles · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Clay Sollenberger
published 4.5
3.47
Angel Chandler
published 3.5
3.41
Susan Volin
published
3.40
Angela Lockhart
published 3.5
3.40
Stephanie Dean
published
3.17
Jen Bertsch
published
3.09
Anne Burt
published 3.5
3.03
Linda Coetzee
published
2.92
Benita Dieperink
published 3
2.77
Wendi Kelly
published
2.73
Laura Maki
published
2.73
Molly Matsumoto
published
2.67
Erika James
published
Jane Kollitz
published
Mary McRaith
published
Teresa Borzcik
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Volin + Angel Chandler8458% games+4.1% vs expected
Jen Bertsch + Susan Volin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Clay Sollenberger
2W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Angel Chandler
55W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
Susan Volin
26W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Angela Lockhart
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.40
Stephanie Dean
27W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
Jen Bertsch
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Anne Burt
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09
Linda Coetzee
21W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Benita Dieperink
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.92
Wendi Kelly
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Laura Maki
15W–21L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Molly Matsumoto
15W–16L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Erika James
27W–32L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
Jane Kollitz
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary McRaith
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Teresa Borzcik
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.