Teams

LTA BLACK

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-05-27vs TTA REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesDavid Riffel / Marco Scalise vs Philip Dixon-Patterson / Eric Jaggers7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJAVIER CHACON vs Russell Bennett7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRoss Becker / John Roberts vs Anthony Garcia / Marcel de Graaf6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesWayne Sidney vs Ryan Schellpeper4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMark Hinman / Idi Omar vs Ricardo Rodriguez / Ryan Pelton2-6, 1-6
2021-05-20vs BRMST REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMarco Scalise / David Riffel vs John Hamill / Stephen Pola6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesIdi Omar vs Walter Mannino1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Roberts / Andy James vs Greg Wolff / Aaron Peterson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRoss Becker / James Callanan vs Christopher Midanier / Gregg Sommer4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-05-13vs CVTA GREYLost 13
L#1 DoublesJames Callanan / Wayne Sidney vs Connor Ohlsen / Matt Miller1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAndy James / John Roberts vs Rocky Nelson / Horatio Nelson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJAVIER CHACON vs AJ Johnson7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Idi Omar vs Brian Carlson / Timmy Bromell3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-05-06vs TTA REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesDavid Riffel / Marco Scalise vs Marcel de Graaf / Anthony Garcia6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJames Callanan / Mark Hinman vs Brian Loflin / Ricardo Rodriguez7-5, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJAVIER CHACON vs Russell Bennett6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRoss Becker / Craig Hoeltgen vs Philip Dixon-Patterson / Ryan Pelton6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-04-29vs BRMST REDWon 50
W#1 DoublesDavid Riffel / Marco Scalise vs Stephen Pola / Gregg Sommer7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesWayne Sidney vs Greg Wolff6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Callanan / Mark Hinman vs Christopher Midanier / Aaron Peterson6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJAVIER CHACON vs Antoine Billat7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Andy James vs Sandy Bass / John Hamill6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2021-04-22vs CVTA GREYWon 32
L#1 DoublesDavid Riffel / Marco Scalise vs Brian DeCorte / Rocky Nelson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRoss Becker vs Connor Ohlsen6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAndy James / John Roberts vs Horatio Nelson / Shawn Smith6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJAVIER CHACON vs Daniel Vukosa6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Idi Omar vs Paul Kolachov / Judson Smith6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CP BLUE7029615226
2DTC SILVER7029617226
3CACM YELLOW52241124256
4SKY GOLD52221331291
5CVTA GREY42181231277
6GAC SILVER33201023228
7LTFC ORANGE33171331266
8LTA BLACK33151536299
9CACI NAVY24102042326
10RHCC GOLD25161945334
11SSLGT GREEN25142151374
12STAP BLACK25102552362
13RRTC RED0672350327

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Craig Hoeltgen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
JAVIER CHACON
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
David Riffel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
James Callanan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.21
Ross Becker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.09
Mark Hinman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.07
Marco Scalise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Wayne Sidney
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.02
David Henderson
published 4.5
3.82
Idi Omar
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.77
Andy James
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marco Scalise + David Riffel101152% games−0.1% vs expected
Mark Hinman + Idi Omar0624% games−22.1% vs expected
Mark Hinman + James Callanan314 matchesnot enough data
Ross Becker + Idi Omar134 matchesnot enough data
Mark Hinman + Marco Scalise123 matchesnot enough data
Mark Hinman + David Riffel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Craig Hoeltgen
67W–23L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
4.43
4.5
JAVIER CHACON
17W–11L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
David Riffel
19W–23L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
James Callanan
27W–28L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
4.24
Ross Becker
13W–21L career · 4 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Mark Hinman
35W–58L career · 3 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
4.09
Marco Scalise
24W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
4.07
Wayne Sidney
15W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
4.04
4.5
David Henderson
8W–31L career · no lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
4.02
4
Idi Omar
53W–81L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Andy James
14W–37L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.