Teams

Quiet Storm 4.5 18+

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over · Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-09vs KG 4.5 18+Won 10
W#2 SinglesLukas Sanidas vs KHOURY ZIAD6-2, 6-3
2022-06-03Won 10
W#2 SinglesLukas Sanidas vs Wayne Trivette6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-05-26vs O'Colman / Craig 18+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Sloan / Vince Sbarra vs Bradley Christensen / Michael Pinkerton4-6, 3-6
2022-05-10Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBruce Fulton vs Carlos Carrizoza3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-02vs O'Colman / Craig 18+Lost 02
L#2 SinglesBruce Fulton vs David Rowlett0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAlexander Spector / Vince Sbarra vs Paul Hsiao / Dan Drennan3-6, 2-6
2022-04-24vs HoCady 4.5 18+Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBruce Fulton vs Ryan Cinoman5-7, 1-6
2022-04-22vs Stepholotta 18+Lost 01
L#2 SinglesBruce Fulton vs Nicholas Colletti3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Robert Kargus
published
4.25
Barry Weiner
published 4.5
4.16
Alexander Thomas
published 4
4.13
Lukas Sanidas
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 4.5
3.99
Michael Sloan
published
3.84
Bruce Fulton
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
James Ginty
published 4
3.72
Jonathan Rivera
published
3.67
Vince Sbarra
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Sloan + Jonathan Rivera5161% games−0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Kargus
17W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Barry Weiner
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Alexander Thomas
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%11%89%
4.16
4.5
Lukas Sanidas
142W–110L career · 7 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
4.13
Michael Sloan
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Bruce Fulton
57W–69L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
James Ginty
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jonathan Rivera
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Vince Sbarra
181W–167L career · 7 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.