Teams

Carter - Pinehurst Resort

2025 Sandhills Adult 55 & over · 3.5 Senior Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-26vs McGuirt - CCNCLost 02
L#2 DoublesEileen Carter / Mia Delk vs Donna Hicks / Victoria Adkins5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Voltz / Kate Humphrey vs MaryBryan Morgan / Beth Collom7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-13vs Harris - Lawn and Tennis 55+Won 10
W#1 DoublesKate Humphrey / Carolyn Voltz vs Jenifir Bruno / Suzanne Wilson6-3, 6-3
2025-04-06vs Bryan - Highland Country ClubSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Voltz / Kate Humphrey vs Kim Hasty / Harriett Shooter3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesEileen Carter / Mia Delk vs Lynn Floyd / Pia Thompson6-3, 6-4
2025-03-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEileen Carter / Carolyn Voltz vs Lisa Nixon / Del Metcalf1-6, 1-6
2025-03-23vs McGuirt - CCNCLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Voltz / Toni Davenport vs Sarah McAdams / Victoria Adkins6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEileen Carter / Mia Delk vs Kay Crist / Amie Irby6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-03-09vs Harris - Lawn and Tennis 55+Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Voltz / Kate Humphrey vs Lynn Goldhammer / Maria Pope6-3, 6-1
2025-03-02vs Bryan - Highland Country ClubLost 01
L#2 DoublesKate Humphrey / Mia Delk vs Lynn Floyd / Charlotte Gallagher6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTracey Harbour / Mia Delk vs Lisa Nixon / Del Metcalf0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Senior Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Mia Delk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.26
Eileen Carter
published
3.25
Carolyn Voltz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Betsy Mitchel
published 3.5
3.19
Lindsay Blackwood
published
3.04
Megan Mercer
published
3.01
2.97
Kate Humphrey
published
Toni Davenport
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mia Delk + Eileen Carter6262% games+8.4% vs expected
Kate Humphrey + Annmarie Anderson2450% games+8.2% vs expected
Megan Mercer + Eileen Carter5157% gamesnot enough data
Annmarie Anderson + Carolyn Voltz314 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Voltz + Eileen Carter123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mia Delk
270W–303L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Eileen Carter
21W–23L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Carolyn Voltz
70W–107L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Betsy Mitchel
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsay Blackwood
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Megan Mercer
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
3
Annmarie Anderson
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Kate Humphrey
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Toni Davenport
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.