Teams

Toleu: Racqueteers 8.0

2025 Mixed 18 & Over Winter · 8.0 MX (FRI)

17 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-14vs Winter25EwenLost 03
L#1 DoublesKarla Toleu / Kraig Gunwall vs Sarah Johnson / Richard Dillman2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKatie Pargal / Mark van Ert vs Emily Walz Lockhart / Brett Pauley7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle Finley / T.J. Majdecki vs Katherine Martinez Carmona / Arjunmohan Mohan2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-01-17vs Winter25EwenWon 21
W#1 DoublesStacy Katsiyiannis / Kraig Gunwall vs Kim Loan Nguyen / Carl Vaughan6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElizabeth van Ert / Mark Gness vs Sarah Steiniger / Max Wilkinson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShanshan Ge / Jeremy Ewers vs Angie Flake / Richard Dillman0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-01-10vs HANSEN 2025 WINTER 8.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesShravan Pargal / Gretchen Seifert vs Jennifer Lewis / David Komula6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPamela van Ert / Mark van Ert vs Beci Bjornson / Richard Lassow7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Finley / Joel Haggerty vs Savannah Olson / Tyler Johnson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MX (FRI) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Shravan Pargal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Elizabeth van Ert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Shanshan Ge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.01
Stacy Katsiyiannis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Mark van Ert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Michelle Finley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Lana Pinnock
published
3.72
Katie Pargal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Gretchen Seifert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
T.J. Majdecki
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Pamela van Ert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Mark Gness
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Jeremy Ewers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joel Haggerty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Justin Webster
published
Karla Toleu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kraig Gunwall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Finley + T.J. Majdecki31441% games−8.6% vs expected
Shravan Pargal + Gretchen Seifert6357% games−13.1% vs expected
Pamela van Ert + Mark van Ert4650% gamesnot enough data
Pamela van Ert + Justin Webster303 matchesnot enough data
Katie Pargal + Justin Webster123 matchesnot enough data
Lana Pinnock + Mark Gness213 matchesnot enough data
Gretchen Seifert + Justin Webster123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shravan Pargal
19W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%10%
4.34
4.5
Elizabeth van Ert
4W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
Shanshan Ge
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.05
Stacy Katsiyiannis
65W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.01
Mark van Ert
20W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.87
Michelle Finley
36W–50L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Lana Pinnock
23W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Katie Pargal
27W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Gretchen Seifert
19W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
T.J. Majdecki
18W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.64
Pamela van Ert
13W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Mark Gness
15W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Jeremy Ewers
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
Joel Haggerty
8W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Justin Webster
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karla Toleu
7W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kraig Gunwall
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.