Teams

DGarretson/MH/BP

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-01-21vs Jedlicka/LR/LRACLost 02
L#1 SinglesMegan Longing vs Tiffani Jedlicka4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKate Hoopchuk vs Jennifer Quilao0-6, 2-6
2025-01-14vs Jedlicka/LR/LRACWon 21
W#1 SinglesRebecca Kinworthy vs Tiffani Jedlicka6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesWhitney Cathcart vs Jennifer Quilao4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJoAnne Wooldridge vs Marisa Cahill5-7, 6-2
2024-12-16vs Jones/LR/PVCCLost 12
W#1 SinglesJoAnne Wooldridge vs Janna Jennings6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesKate Hoopchuk vs Eden Raines0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesRebecca Kinworthy vs Courtney Jones3-6, 3-6
2024-11-14vs GarretsonD/MH/RebLost 12
W#1 SinglesRebecca Kinworthy vs Jennifer Fielding0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesYun Young vs Michele Stearns6-4, 0-5
L#3 SinglesHeather Mainord vs Tess Bradford5-7, 4-6
2024-11-07vs Jedlicka/LR/LRACLost 12
L#1 SinglesMegan Longing vs Jennifer Quilao7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesWhitney Cathcart vs Tiffani Jedlicka4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesRebecca Kinworthy vs Marisa Cahill6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-29vs Jones/LR/PVCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesWhitney Cathcart vs Michele Brewer1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesHeather Mainord vs Janna Jennings0-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesRebecca Kinworthy vs Kati Beth Lewis6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Kate Hoopchuk
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.69
Rebecca Kinworthy
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.64
Heather Mainord
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.63
Megan Longing
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.61
Yun Young
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.55
Whitney Cathcart
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.38
Deanna Garretson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
JoAnne Wooldridge
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Mainord + Yun Young3447% games−2.3% vs expected
Heather Mainord + Kate Hoopchuk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Hoopchuk
22W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Rebecca Kinworthy
146W–99L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
Heather Mainord
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
Megan Longing
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
Yun Young
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.61
Whitney Cathcart
11W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Deanna Garretson
22W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
JoAnne Wooldridge
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.