Teams

Kowalczyk, Rebecca

2024 Adult 40 & Over Daytime League 3.0 - 4.5 · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-02-12vs Davenport, PhoebeLost 12
W#1 DoublesMeta Cunningham / Marcy Earwood vs Cindy Famuliner / Betsy Graverson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Thompson / Tatyana Zaslavskaya vs Natalie Weber / Phoebe Davenport2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane True / Karen Ramsden vs Laura Fosha / Diane Strahl6-7, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Laura Noll
published
3.27
Pamela ODonnell
published
3.25
Linda Shinn
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.21
Meta Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Patty Morton
published
3.05
Robin Ayers
published
2.93
Jane True
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Ramsden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marcy Earwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Kowalczyk
published
Tatyana Zaslavskaya
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Morton + Linda Shinn15459% games+8.1% vs expected
Rebecca Kowalczyk + Karen Ramsden5459% games+4.5% vs expected
Robin Ayers + Karen Ramsden4356% games+1.6% vs expected
Jane True + Robin Ayers3353% games−0.5% vs expected
Pamela ODonnell + Rebecca Kowalczyk6557% games−1.5% vs expected
Jane True + Karen Ramsden3352% games−11.8% vs expected
Laura Noll + Linda Shinn2641% games−12.3% vs expected
Jane True + Pamela ODonnell1542% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Noll
28W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.37
Pamela ODonnell
32W–66L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Linda Shinn
82W–89L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Meta Cunningham
30W–27L career · 1 line in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
Patty Morton
43W–77L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.14
Robin Ayers
42W–39L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jane True
31W–40L career · 1 line in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.93
Karen Ramsden
45W–37L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Marcy Earwood
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Kowalczyk
42W–31L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tatyana Zaslavskaya
81W–33L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.