Teams

Apex:LuckyStrings:Kapothanasis

2025 ME Adult 55 & Over Women · 8.0 55 & Over Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-11vs FF:BosworthWon 20
W#1 DoublesSharon Wedge / Catherine Sherman vs Kristen Martin / Polly Colvin MacKenzie7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesValentina Kapothanasis / Anne Vaillancourt vs Lori Poulin / Deanna Mao6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-09vs FF:BosworthWon 30
W#1 DoublesHilary Holm / Sharon Wedge vs Polly Colvin MacKenzie / Kristen Martin6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNiamh Colpitts / Valentina Kapothanasis vs Barbara Neff / Deanna Mao6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Sherman / Karin Conroy vs Lori Poulin / Lorena Coffin7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2025-06-04vs FF:BosworthLost 12
W#1 DoublesHilary Holm / Sharon Wedge vs Barbee Gilman / Lorena Coffin6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesValentina Kapothanasis / Martha Long vs Kristen Martin / Polly Colvin MacKenzie6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKarin Conroy / Patricia Prescott vs Barbara Neff / Deanna Mao5-7, 4-6
2025-06-02vs FF:BosworthWon 21
W#1 DoublesHilary Holm / Amy Hafey vs Barbee Gilman / Patrice Fallon3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Prescott / Valentina Kapothanasis vs Barbara Neff / Lorena Coffin6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesNiamh Colpitts / Anne Vaillancourt vs Deanna Mao / Kristen Martin6-2, 6-2
2025-05-28vs FF:BosworthLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Hafey / Hilary Holm vs Barbara Neff / Kristen Martin6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPatricia Prescott / Valentina Kapothanasis vs Barbee Gilman / Lorena Coffin6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-19vs FF:BosworthWon 30
W#1 DoublesSharon Wedge / Hilary Holm vs Donna Dwyer / Deanna Mao6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesValentina Kapothanasis / Anne Vaillancourt vs Barbee Gilman / Holly Steele6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMartha Long / Niamh Colpitts vs Lori Poulin / Kristen Martin6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 8.0 55 & Over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Apex:LuckyStrings:Kapothanasis4212617152

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Jacqueline Bryan
published
3.95
Amy Hafey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Catherine Sherman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Patricia Prescott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.80
Anne Vaillancourt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Sharon Wedge
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.79
Valentina Kapothanasis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Hilary Holm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Niamh Colpitts
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Martha Long
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Karin Conroy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Wedge + Hilary Holm5069% games+16.1% vs expected
Amy Hafey + Jacqueline Bryan12261% games+7.3% vs expected
Anne Vaillancourt + Valentina Kapothanasis6061% games+5.8% vs expected
Patricia Prescott + Hilary Holm342453% games+4.5% vs expected
Anne Vaillancourt + Martha Long2345% games+3.0% vs expected
Karin Conroy + Catherine Sherman101649% games−1.8% vs expected
Patricia Prescott + Sharon Wedge134 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Wedge + Catherine Sherman404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacqueline Bryan
164W–85L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Amy Hafey
95W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Catherine Sherman
104W–67L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
Patricia Prescott
99W–61L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Anne Vaillancourt
102W–87L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
Sharon Wedge
112W–90L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Valentina Kapothanasis
151W–97L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Hilary Holm
146W–96L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Niamh Colpitts
49W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Martha Long
51W–46L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Karin Conroy
222W–150L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.