Teams

Gonzalez (Alper JCC)

2021 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Fall Night · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-12-07vs Perlman (Coral Reef)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesDenise Banciella vs Sharon Singh1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNereyda Gonzalez / Chantal Salnave vs Velyne Genece-Oloye / Claudia Gomes4-6, 1-6
2020-11-23Lost 01
L#1 SinglesNereyda Gonzalez vs Pauline Markowicz3-6, 4-6
2020-11-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesNereyda Gonzalez vs Heidi Funke6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2020-11-16vs Porras (Crandon)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesIsabel Maestu / Denise Banciella vs Yamila Porras / Aneta Kulesza Mestrinelli5-7, 1-6
2020-10-29vs Gayle (Shulas)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesYersika Fernandez Labrador / Yolanda Sosa vs Yoandra Perez / Diana Valbuena3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Banciella / Chantal Salnave vs Patricia Carroll-Tzakis / Karen Graham Sewing2-6, 0-6
2020-10-28vs Berg (Coral Pine)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesYersika Fernandez Labrador / Denise Banciella vs Penelope Johnson / Bertha Lowell2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Isabel Maestu
published 4
3.17
Alejandra Hanson
published 3.5
2.85
Yolanda Sosa
published
2.73
Yersika Fernandez Labrador
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Margaret Shanti
published
2.65
Denise Banciella
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.58
Nereyda Gonzalez
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Lucia Soria
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Banciella + Yersika Fernandez Labrador033 matchesnot enough data
Yersika Fernandez Labrador + Isabel Maestu303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Isabel Maestu
108W–93L career · no lines in 2021
32%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Alejandra Hanson
7W–19L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%1%
3.17
Yolanda Sosa
17W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Yersika Fernandez Labrador
181W–159L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
Margaret Shanti
1W–6L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Denise Banciella
45W–189L career · 4 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Nereyda Gonzalez
68W–72L career · 3 lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
2.58
Lucia Soria
0W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.