← Teams

VTC-Archedon

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.39 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Hisayoshi Watanabe
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.33
Andy LaFrazia
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
—
Bob Towne
published 3.5
3.12
Mister Archedon
published 3.5
3.12
Ramon Tuason
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.07
Brad Shafer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Lee Wiegand
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
David Shook
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.82
Steven Darling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Butch Brock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results7 ties
2022-11-19Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesMister Archedon / Ramon Tuason vs RICK ROGOWAY / Gary Townsend6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Shook / Brad Shafer vs Shirish Patel / Gary McKenzie7-5, 6-0
2022-11-16Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMister Archedon / David Shook vs Steven Keo / Wes Milligan6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBrad Shafer / Lee Wiegand vs Robert Truong / Gerry Nuthmann6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesHisayoshi Watanabe / Andrew Geisler vs James Lawrence / Dale Christensen7-5, 6-3
2022-10-30Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMister Archedon / Ramon Tuason vs Marc Alexander / Jeffrey Bayless6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLee Wiegand / David Shook vs Glenn Eisen / JOHN KNOX6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrad Shafer / Andrew Geisler vs Dirk Jacobs / Tim Leatherman6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-10-15Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesRamon Tuason / Brad Shafer vs Robert Broad / Jim DeWeese6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAndy LaFrazia / Mister Archedon vs Jeff Anhaltzer / Eric Halvorson6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesButch Brock / Steven Darling vs George Husbands / Tommy Atkins6-1, 6-3
2022-10-09Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesBrad Shafer / Ramon Tuason vs Arjun Bilakanti / Jonathan Lo7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHisayoshi Watanabe / Steven Darling vs Nick Majmudar / Michael Gilbertson7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMister Archedon / Andy LaFrazia vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSteven Darling / Hisayoshi Watanabe vs Evan Cohn / Dean Waters6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDavid Shook / Lee Wiegand vs Chuck Yett / Than LE6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAndy LaFrazia / Mister Archedon vs Michael Jansen / Murray Jansen6-0, 7-5
2022-09-11Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSteven Darling / Russ Gage vs Bruce Robertson / Paul Laurent6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Shook / Ramon Tuason vs Jim Gerber / Scott Beall6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLee Wiegand / Mister Archedon vs Steve Harris / Jeff Streich0-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Hisayoshi Watanabe
56W–55L career
3%96%0%
3.72
3.5
Andy LaFrazia
65W–34L career
4%86%10%
3.33
3.5
Bob Towne
17W–28L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Mister Archedon
108W–47L career
7%93%0%
3.12
3.5
Ramon Tuason
59W–74L career
9%91%0%
3.12
3.5
Brad Shafer
18W–62L career
18%82%0%
3.07
3
Lee Wiegand
62W–61L career · type A
0%70%30%
3.05
3
David Shook
34W–36L career
0%91%9%
2.92
3
Steven Darling
63W–87L career
0%99%1%
2.82
0
Butch Brock
7W–2L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.