Teams

KSmith (Piper Glen)

2025 Tri-Level 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 2.5

12 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-01vs RRiechelmann/CLogar (WSRC)Split 11
L#2 DoublesKelli Arenson / Lynn Freitas vs Renata Riechelmann / Carron Flinter5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCarrie Gilman / Jennifer Lang vs Pamela Trantham / Heather Burch6-3, 7-5
2025-07-25vs KGJohnson (Sardis)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesUrsula Bonar / Kelli Arenson vs Meredith Heimburger / Erica Adcock1-6, 1-6
2025-06-27vs CMcKiernan (Raintree)Won 10
W#3 DoublesByra Vion / Kelli Arenson vs Libby Noelke / Erica Testerman7-5, 6-4
2025-06-06vs CAckels (PCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTesha Davis / Carrie Gilman vs Julia Murphy / Sumi Gerry0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Beth Dunn
published 3
2.67
Malu Tan
published
2.57
Carrie Gilman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.45
Kelli Arenson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.30
Lynn Freitas
published
2.25
Wanda Mallette
published
2.22
Kalyn Smith
published
2.17
Ursula Bonar
published
Byra Vion
published
Jo Dockins
published
Tesha Davis
published
Ty Hands
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ursula Bonar + Kelli Arenson033 matchesnot enough data
Tesha Davis + Ty Hands123 matchesnot enough data
Kalyn Smith + Malu Tan123 matchesnot enough data
Kalyn Smith + Wanda Mallette033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Beth Dunn
27W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
Malu Tan
3W–16L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
2.5
Carrie Gilman
27W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%31%69%
2.57
2.5
Kelli Arenson
35W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%65%35%
2.45
Lynn Freitas
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.30
Wanda Mallette
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.25
Kalyn Smith
5W–19L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Ursula Bonar
11W–30L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Byra Vion
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jo Dockins
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tesha Davis
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ty Hands
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.