Teams

THyso/KMoss (Life Time)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-04-25vs JLee (Colonel Francis Beatty)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCatherine Holwager / Katie Kuehner vs Nancy L Nicholson / Elisa Salim1-6, 1-6
2022-03-02vs LHuntington (Queens)Won 10
W#3 DoublesHeather Tselentis / Katie Kuehner vs Punky Brick / Gray Setaro6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Corine Danesis
published 4
3.13
Hilda Austin
published 3.5
3.08
Eileen Cohen
published 3.5
2.80
2.76
Trisha Hyso
published
2.75
Elizabeth Myers
published 3
2.67
2.65
Katie Kuehner
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Cory Mondshane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Myers + Catherine Holwager5157% games+0.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Myers + Katie Kuehner134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Corine Danesis
34W–29L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
3.5
Hilda Austin
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Eileen Cohen
13W–19L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Catherine Holwager
7W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Trisha Hyso
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Elizabeth Myers
17W–24L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Heather Tselentis
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Katie Kuehner
50W–89L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
2.65
Cory Mondshane
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.