Teams

World Tennis Club / Draz

2026 Collier Adult 65 & Over Winter · 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-02vs Pelican Marsh / Elizabeth GLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Donnelly / Valentina Demidenko vs Kimberly Taylor / Nila Gray2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Black / Hildy Glick vs Marell Kowalski / Rosie Renfro7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSusan Clark / Julie Meyer vs Julie Smith / Elizabeth Giannetti6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-23vs Naples YMCA / MagnoLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiane Donnelly / Hildy Glick vs Janet Ellis / Caroline Rogers6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVickie Busby / Susan Clark vs Diana Heckert / Carola Heinrich5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Black / Mara Morris vs Martha Peterson / Susan Magno0-6, 4-6
2026-02-16vs Naples YMCA / MagnoWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Donnelly / Vickie Busby vs Ellen Hermannsson / Barbara Frank6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMara Morris / Susan Clark vs Diana Heckert / Carola Heinrich7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesValentina Demidenko / Shirley Draz vs Jennifer Archie / Nancy Hansen7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2026-02-09vs Fiddlers Creek / V.CooperWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Brown / Vickie Busby vs Donna Burns / Shawn Fiore6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Black / Hildy Glick vs Marianne Gaffney / Vicki Cooper6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Donnelly / Tina Megginson vs Leslie Sheldon / Carolyn Marek6-2, 6-1
2026-02-02vs COLLIER / J. HowardWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Donnelly / Hildy Glick vs Gail Hayton / Debbie Quitadamo6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Clark / Julie Meyer vs Jincie Duane / Dawn Cyr3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesShirley Draz / Valentina Demidenko vs Jaclyn Sturges / Catherine Kelly6-3, 7-6
2026-01-26vs Eagle Creek/ KeelyLost 12
W#1 DoublesDiane Donnelly / Sandra Sanders vs Sharon Swafford / Teki Hall1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMara Morris / Susan Clark vs Linda Koole / Ricki Levine7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTina Megginson / Shirley Draz vs Linda Keely / Louise Decker2-6, 6-7
2026-01-19vs Bonita Bay / K. NorthWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Black / Mara Morris vs Julie Oberweis / Kim Stencel6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVickie Busby / Nancy Brown vs Lee O'Daniel / Elizabeth Lachner6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesValentina Demidenko / Sandra Sanders vs Denise Spears / Gail Morley2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-01-12vs Sterling Oaks/GiannettaWon 30
W#1 DoublesDiane Donnelly / Sandra Sanders vs Flavia Jorge / Trudy Searle7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHildy Glick / Mara Morris vs Sharon Case / Taylor Knauer6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesValentina Demidenko / Shirley Draz vs Marty Tessoni / Maryanne Harper6-2, 6-4
2026-01-05vs Pelican Marsh / Elizabeth GWon 30
W#1 DoublesSandra Sanders / Diane Donnelly vs Elizabeth Giannetti / Marell Kowalski7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNancy Black / Hildy Glick vs K VICTORY / Diane Gurba6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesVickie Busby / Nancy Brown vs Gail Oroho / Paula Federman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Diane Donnelly
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 47% · published 3.5
3.34
Vickie Busby
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.31
Sandra Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Hildy Glick
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Mara Morris
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Nancy Black
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Shirley Draz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Clark
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Tina Megginson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Valentina Demidenko
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Sanders + Diane Donnelly10256% games−3.3% vs expected
Nancy Black + Hildy Glick6162% gamesnot enough data
Valentina Demidenko + Shirley Draz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diane Donnelly
86W–52L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Vickie Busby
88W–74L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
Sandra Sanders
49W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Hildy Glick
11W–1L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Meyer
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mara Morris
21W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Black
70W–90L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shirley Draz
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Clark
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tina Megginson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Valentina Demidenko
8W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.