Teams

Henneman/Bartell 55+ 8.0 Winter

2026 Adult 55 & Over Winter · 8.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-16vs Duwearatchi/Bharath 55+ WinterWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Leehy / David Wareham vs Paul Sariego / Eric Ziegler7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Turnham / David Komula vs Jason Thiner / Timothy Edmund7-5, 6-1
2026-03-09vs Torres: The DropshotsWon 20
W#1 DoublesGreg Elfstrum / Alan Stratton vs Tom Henjum / Brian Reidinger7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWilliam Henneman / David Komula vs Jeff Sprinkel / Henry Finch6-3, 6-4
2026-03-02vs Peschel W2026Won 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Turnham / Geoffrey Elfstrum vs Richard Keller / Hal Voges6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGreg Elfstrum / Matt Bartell vs Doug MacGibbon / Edwin Freeman6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlan Stratton / David Wareham vs Daniel Sebring / Lonny Wittnebel6-2, 6-0
2026-02-09vs Reichling/Heimerman 55+ SwillersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Leehy / David Komula vs Mark Wanous / Curt Hedin2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWilliam Henneman / Scott Luhman vs Robert Heimerman / Andrei Sivanich2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesScott Lundquist / Doug Roseth vs David Senior / Boyd Miller1-6, 2-6
2026-02-02vs Torres: The DropshotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Turnham / Greg Elfstrum vs Brian Reidinger / Tom Henjum7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Komula / John Leehy vs Bob Christiansen / Robert Conway6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesWilliam Henneman / David Wareham vs Jeff Sprinkel / Henry Finch7-5, 6-4
2026-01-26vs Peschel W2026Won 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Leehy / David Komula vs Stewart Stone / Pablo Levi6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGreg Elfstrum / Alan Stratton vs Doug MacGibbon / Edwin Freeman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDoug Roseth / Scott Lundquist vs Lonny Wittnebel / Gregory Vanheest6-2, 6-2
2026-01-19vs Duwearatchi/Bharath 55+ WinterLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Henneman / David Komula vs Booshan Bharath / Paul Schoenecker2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Turnham / Geoffrey Elfstrum vs Jason Thiner / Paul Sariego6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesScott Luhman / John Leehy vs Chris Johnson / Thomas Genz6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-01-05vs Reichling/Heimerman 55+ SwillersLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlan Stratton / John Turnham vs Robert Heimerman / Boyd Miller6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesScott Luhman / David Wareham vs Curt Hedin / Mark Wanous2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMatt Bartell / Greg Elfstrum vs Andrei Sivanich / David Senior4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Reichling/Heimerman 55+ Swillers7119513157
2Duwearatchi/Bharath 55+ Winter62141025217
3Henneman/Bartell 55+ 8.0 Winter5317718184
4Peschel W20261771737246
5Torres: The Dropshots1732144288

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Doug Roseth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
David Komula
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.88
Geoffrey Elfstrum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.85
Scott Luhman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Alan Stratton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
John Leehy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.78
Matt Bartell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Greg Elfstrum
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.75
David Wareham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
Scott Lundquist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Turnham
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
William Henneman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug Roseth + Scott Lundquist4167% gamesnot enough data
William Henneman + Scott Luhman224 matchesnot enough data
Greg Elfstrum + Alan Stratton404 matchesnot enough data
Doug Roseth + Scott Luhman303 matchesnot enough data
John Leehy + David Komula213 matchesnot enough data
Geoffrey Elfstrum + Greg Elfstrum033 matchesnot enough data
Geoffrey Elfstrum + John Turnham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Doug Roseth
31W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
David Komula
28W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
Geoffrey Elfstrum
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
Scott Luhman
30W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.85
4
Alan Stratton
16W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
John Leehy
8W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Matt Bartell
65W–80L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Greg Elfstrum
41W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
David Wareham
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.75
Scott Lundquist
135W–84L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
John Turnham
11W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
William Henneman
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.