Teams

A2 Westwood Hustlaz Kirkeby/Wetzel

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-05-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarlyle Walek / Kristy Seredni vs Kemper Wright / Tricia Schofield Bezek6-0, 6-0
2021-04-17vs A4 LPC MaddenWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarlyle Walek / Kimberley Stovall vs Andrea Siebentritt / Caroline Lacy6-2, 6-0
2021-04-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesSamantha Wetzel / Carlyle Walek vs Stephanie Ford / Tawny Chamberlain6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Kristy Seredni
published 3.5
3.45
Carlyle Walek
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Jamie McLeod
published 3.5
Cody Nystrom
published 3.5
3.09
Meredith Berger
published
3.06
Jenny Sharrar
published
3.04
Kindra Kirkeby
published
2.92
Samantha Wetzel
published
2.81
Kirstine Wilson
published
2.62
Katrin Wilcox
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristy Seredni + Carlyle Walek433654% games+1.1% vs expected
Jenny Sharrar + Kirstine Wilson404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristy Seredni
150W–89L career · no lines in 2021
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Carlyle Walek
129W–89L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Jamie McLeod
11W–12L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Cody Nystrom
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Meredith Berger
7W–3L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
Jenny Sharrar
16W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%31%69%
3.06
Kindra Kirkeby
17W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%39%61%
3.04
Samantha Wetzel
19W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
2.92
Kirstine Wilson
16W–13L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.81
Katrin Wilcox
6W–11L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.