Teams

MFigard (OPRC)

2022 Combo Doubles 65 & Over League · 65 & Over 7.5 Women - Fri AM

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-23vs DBuchman (Charlotte Indoor)Won 20
W#1 DoublesDebbie Carmazzi / Irene Kossack vs Denise Bost / Patty Kahle6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Wandler / Patti Ratcliffe vs Sandra Stowe / Joy Landesman6-2, 6-4
2022-09-16vs DBuchman (Charlotte Indoor)Split 11
W#1 DoublesDebbie Carmazzi / Beverly Moore vs Patty Kahle / Sandra Stowe5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatti Ratcliffe / Irene Kossack vs Meridy Kennington / Sally Lowrance1-6, 2-6
2022-09-02vs DBuchman (Charlotte Indoor)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Wandler / Patti Ratcliffe vs Julie Benton / Donna Buchman6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDebbie Carmazzi / Beverly Moore vs Lina Mazigi / Sally Lowrance6-4, 6-2
2022-09-02vs DBuchman (Charlotte Indoor)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarsha McCrory / Patti Ratcliffe vs Donna Buchman / Denise Bost6-4, 7-6
2022-08-26vs DBuchman (Charlotte Indoor)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDebbie Carmazzi / Irene Kossack vs Meridy Kennington / Sally Lowrance4-6, 1-6
2022-08-19vs DBuchman (Charlotte Indoor)Won 21
W#1 DoublesPatti Ratcliffe / Marsha McCrory vs Denise Bost / Donna Buchman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebbie Carmazzi / Irene Kossack vs Lina Mazigi / Mildred Deely6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDorothy Gandar / Jean Sanderson vs Patty Kahle / Sandra Stowe5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over 7.5 Women - Fri AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Debbie Carmazzi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.53
Rosemary Hill
published
3.31
Patti Ratcliffe
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.01
Jean Sanderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dorothy Gandar
published
Irene Kossack
published
Marla Figard
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debbie Carmazzi
68W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Rosemary Hill
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Patti Ratcliffe
57W–24L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3
Jean Sanderson
23W–13L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.01
Dorothy Gandar
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Irene Kossack
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marla Figard
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.