Teams

Team 8 Nadeshiko

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesAmy Cahoon vs Silvia Gulino6-3, 7-5
2022-03-27vs Team 3 Hot SeatsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDanielle Frazier / Joanne Good vs Stephanie Bozarth / Andrea Gevas4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Cahoon / Amanda L B Ronco vs Stephanie Glashow / Patricia Trapanese6-0, 6-4
2022-03-20vs Team 15 Sweet ShotsLost 01
L#1 SinglesAmy Cahoon vs Miyako Pastor2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-14vs Team 19Won 10
W#1 DoublesErrin Matechak / Mary Cepko vs Gibson McMahon / Pam Murphy6-2, 6-4
2022-03-02vs Team 1 Servivors.Won 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Frazier / Errin Matechak vs Karen Barnes / Jolyn Green6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAnn-Lee Chen / Amanda Miller vs Kristin Clegg / Ellen Dague7-5, 1-1
2022-02-25vs Team 12 WGCC 1Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnn-Lee Chen / Errin Matechak vs Dunia Pasternak / Pepper Binner6-4, 6-3
2022-02-13Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAmy Cahoon vs Ann Vernon6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-02-05vs Team 10 WildStringsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesErrin Matechak / Mary Cepko vs Laurie Oberembt / Tara Gyenis0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Cahoon vs Julie Kemp6-3, 4-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Errin Matechak
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.79
Carolyn Healy
published 4
3.69
Sarah Schrieber
published
3.34
Ann-Lee Chen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Amy Cahoon
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Mary Cepko
published
3.27
Joanne Good
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Danielle Frazier
published 3.5
3.13
Shawn Dalton
published
Kim Monk
published
Lauren Rowley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Cahoon + Ann-Lee Chen0627% gamesnot enough data
Ann-Lee Chen + Errin Matechak213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Errin Matechak
176W–161L career · 8 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Carolyn Healy
49W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Sarah Schrieber
42W–44L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Ann-Lee Chen
216W–224L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Amy Cahoon
181W–281L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Mary Cepko
36W–28L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Joanne Good
85W–87L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Danielle Frazier
12W–20L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Shawn Dalton
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
Kim Monk
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lauren Rowley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.